1998
DOI: 10.1093/oxrep/14.3.81
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fiscal discipline and flexibility in EMU: the implementation of the Stability and Growth Pact

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
49
0
4

Year Published

2000
2000
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 154 publications
(54 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
1
49
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…An (imperfect) indication of the degree of automatic stabilisation is provided by Commission estimates that, on average in Europe, a 1 percentage fall in GDP relative to trend (a one percentage point increase in the output gap) feeds through to a 0.5 percentage point deterioration in the budget position. (See, for example, Buti et al 1998). As is well known, the degree of automatic stabilisation and the sensitivity of the budget to movements in GDP is considerably higher than 0.5 in some high tax countries, such as Sweden and the Netherlands (of the order of 0.6 or 0.7).…”
Section: Macroeconomics Of the Euro Area As A Wholementioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…An (imperfect) indication of the degree of automatic stabilisation is provided by Commission estimates that, on average in Europe, a 1 percentage fall in GDP relative to trend (a one percentage point increase in the output gap) feeds through to a 0.5 percentage point deterioration in the budget position. (See, for example, Buti et al 1998). As is well known, the degree of automatic stabilisation and the sensitivity of the budget to movements in GDP is considerably higher than 0.5 in some high tax countries, such as Sweden and the Netherlands (of the order of 0.6 or 0.7).…”
Section: Macroeconomics Of the Euro Area As A Wholementioning
confidence: 98%
“…One of the worries about the Stability and Growth Pact is that it may limit the operation of the fiscal stabilisers. Buti et al (1998) turned the rhetoric on its head, arguing that that the medium-term provisions of the pact, over the cycle, if met, would allow the fiscal stabilisers to operate as they should. This way of looking at the issues is now, effectively, EU policy-see, for example, European Commission (2001)-and is built into the rhetoric of the ECB which accepts that in the current slowdown, countries that have succeeded in consolidating their fiscal position should allow the fiscal stabilisers to operate (within the asymmetric 3% upper limit): other countries with relatively large deficits or with high debt ratios, should not give up on attaining the objectives of the SGP.…”
Section: Fiscal Issues For the Area As A Wholementioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, this is not a new debate in the literature of European macroeconomics [7,8]. Rather new are the institutional challenges with respect to a coherent and efficient rule-based economic and fiscal union.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The SGP was created to enforce fiscal discipline in the Euro-area in order to safeguard the credibility of the ECB (Buti et al, 1998;Eichengreen and Wyplosz, 1998). While the Pact itself was not specifically intended to limit public sector pay excess, it was designed to continue to tie governments' hands, which may have otherwise been inclined to re-engage with expansionary fiscal policies.…”
Section: Iversen and Franzese Neglect The Effect Of Monetary Conservamentioning
confidence: 99%