2004
DOI: 10.1068/c0247
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fiscal Decentralization in the Czech and Slovak Republics: A Comparative Study of Moral Hazard

Abstract: Fiscal decentralization has provided neither the benefits of decentralization nor an independent revenue source for subnational governments in the Czech and Slovak Republics. In Slovakia, political conditions early in the transition led to the relative neglect of revenue transfers from the center. This produced financial stress but also encouraged greater fiscal independence for local governments. It also forced them to seek maximal property tax revenues. The Czech Republic made more substantial transfers to l… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
(8 reference statements)
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…So even though the Czech municipalities have enjoyed significantly greater resources from transferred taxes and subsidies, they have not perceived themselves to be better endowed with funds for investments in capital facilities. An explicit comparison of the municipal and central government budgets of the two republics in the transition period shows that the Czech municipalities have enjoyed substantially greater revenues through transfers and subsidies than their less affluent Slovak counterparts (Bryson & Cornia 2003;Bryson et al 2004). …”
Section: Czech Republicmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…So even though the Czech municipalities have enjoyed significantly greater resources from transferred taxes and subsidies, they have not perceived themselves to be better endowed with funds for investments in capital facilities. An explicit comparison of the municipal and central government budgets of the two republics in the transition period shows that the Czech municipalities have enjoyed substantially greater revenues through transfers and subsidies than their less affluent Slovak counterparts (Bryson & Cornia 2003;Bryson et al 2004). …”
Section: Czech Republicmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Whilst floor area can be determined, as it is a matter of fact, accuracy remains an issue. More fundamentally, in developing and transitional countries, as elsewhere, larger properties are not necessarily more valuable than smaller ones and do not necessarily consume more services (Balas and Kovacs, 1999;Bryson and Cornia, 2000;Bryson et al, 2004). This therefore challenges the unmodified area based approach on both the benefit and ability to pay principles of taxation and in terms of both horiseontal and vertical equity.…”
Section: The Role Of Property Tax In the Developing Worldmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…So even though the Czech municipalities have enjoyed significantly greater resources from transferred taxes and subsidies, they have not perceived themselves better endowed with funds for investments in capital facilities. An explicit comparison of the municipal and central government budgets of the two Republics in the transition period shows that the Czech municipalities have enjoyed substantially greater revenues through transfers and subsidies than their less affluent Slovak counterparts Cornia 2003, andWheeler 2004).…”
Section: Perceptions Of Local Autonomy and The Sufficiency Of The Funmentioning
confidence: 99%