The results of a survey of local government officials from the Slovak and Czech Republics taken in December of 2005 are presented and analysed. Attitudes about and perspectives on intergovernmental fiscal relations in the two republics are probed. Differences and similarities in Czech and Slovak views are established regarding some of the perceptions of local autonomy and the sufficiency of available funds; whether or not public services are supplied by the appropriate levels of government; the potential benefits of adopting a serious rather than a nominal property tax; and the flexibility of local budget planning in Czech and Slovak cities and towns. MANY OBSERVERS HAVE VIEWED THE PROCESS of economic transition as consisting largely of the privatisation of state-owned enterprises and the establishment of market relations in the countries involved. However, the transition of the public sector in countries once managed by central planning regimes has also been a very important and difficult part of that historic development. The public sector under central planning was highly centralised so that the ruling party could maintain a tight monopoly over the country's decision-making powers. Thus, among other changes, economic transition has required a process of fiscal decentralisation to restore some autonomy to local government. Bryson and Cornia (2000) have outlined the development and difficulties of the initial, somewhat lukewarm attempts of the Slovak and Czech Republics to pursue fiscal decentralisation. In reviewing the efforts of other transition states, the OECD (