2015
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.2594338
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fiscal Decentralization and China's Regional Infant Mortality

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The findings suggest that a higher proportion of tax revenues raised and/or controlled locally as well as a lower transfer dependency on the central government, consistently reduced IMR. However, fiscal decentralization failed to reduce IMR for China (Brocka, Jinb, and Zenga 2015). Pérez-Moreno, Blanco-Arana, and Bárcena-Martín (2016) examine the effects of economic growth and recession periods on IMR in low-income countries during the period 1990-2010.…”
Section: Infant Mortality Child Mortality and Economic Growthmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The findings suggest that a higher proportion of tax revenues raised and/or controlled locally as well as a lower transfer dependency on the central government, consistently reduced IMR. However, fiscal decentralization failed to reduce IMR for China (Brocka, Jinb, and Zenga 2015). Pérez-Moreno, Blanco-Arana, and Bárcena-Martín (2016) examine the effects of economic growth and recession periods on IMR in low-income countries during the period 1990-2010.…”
Section: Infant Mortality Child Mortality and Economic Growthmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Though, Brock et al (2015) establish that decentralisation does not reduce infant mortality in China.…”
Section: 2mentioning
confidence: 97%
“…This is termed fiscal decentralization-and it is a process by which a central government cedes powers from the exclusive legislative list to the sub-national government for economic development [1]. "It can also be seen as a twodimensional policy that involves either decentralization of a tax instrument when states and local governments bear the responsibility for implementing full expenditure functions [37][38][39][40][41][42][43][44]. Or a situation where states and local governments are allowed more revenue sources.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%