2019
DOI: 10.1080/03003930.2019.1635016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fiscal and political determinants of local government involvement in public-private partnership (PPP)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Local government decisions made in conditions of fiscal constraint and political struggle can blur the MPP value-for-money aim. Polish municipalities, for example, with higher levels of indebtedness and stronger electoral competition had a higher probability of opening MPP tenders (Kopańska and Asinski 2019), while those depending more on state and European grants engaged less in MPP.…”
Section: Pros and Cons Of Municipal-private Partnershipsmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Local government decisions made in conditions of fiscal constraint and political struggle can blur the MPP value-for-money aim. Polish municipalities, for example, with higher levels of indebtedness and stronger electoral competition had a higher probability of opening MPP tenders (Kopańska and Asinski 2019), while those depending more on state and European grants engaged less in MPP.…”
Section: Pros and Cons Of Municipal-private Partnershipsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Economic efficiency and 'value for money' are major rationales for MPP, assuming a superior capacity of the private sector, and opting to create a competitive environment for the provision of public services, in line with New Public Management principles (Kopańska and Asinski 2019;Siemiatycki 2015;van den Hurk 2018). MPP is particularly advantageous where municipalities lack management capacity and MPP may reduce cost-overruns and delays in completion -savings that overweigh higher financing and transaction costs of MPP.…”
Section: Pros and Cons Of Municipal-private Partnershipsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…politicians, citizens, public officials and interest groups – interact to satisfy their own selfish needs (Buchanan, 2009). According to Kopań ska and Asinski (2019) and Stalebrink and Sacco (2006), reelection is the politicians' main goal, which creates an incentive to use public policy for their own advantage. Yet, the other market agents, who are also self-centered, actively attempt to maximize their own utility, putting considerable pressure on the politicians.…”
Section: Background and Research Hypothesesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Kopanska and Asinski (2019) show that more indebted LGs tend to open public‐private partnerships (PPPs), while LGs financed by grants are less engaged in PPPs. The mayors of LGs with stronger electoral competition are more likely to engage in PPPs.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most critical part of a LG's budget is covered by transfers from the central government (60% for municipalities and 42% for cities). It is impossible to use those transfers to soften local budgets (Swianiewicz, 2014; Kopanska & Asinski, 2019). Less wealthy LGs receive more transfers and grants.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%