1988
DOI: 10.1017/s0020743800053678
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fiscal and Monetary Systems in the Mahdist Sudan, 1881–1898

Abstract: This article focuses on two major aspects of the Mahdist political economy, i.e., its fiscal and monetary systems. It attempts to integrate an analysis of their structure with that of the political behavior of the Mahdist rulers in order to show how the Mahdist rulers' political power and personal aspirations affected the development of both systems. In doing so, the article will be primarily concerned with the struggle of the successors of the Mahdi for resource control; it will examine the efforts of the rul… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0
1

Year Published

1992
1992
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
1
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Seven provincial Bait el mals were created and supervised by central Biat el mal at Omdurman, which reports on daily basis to the Khalifa and submits monthly budget as well. Also, to ensure efficiency the Khalifa appointed many foreigners in the administration of the funds (about 30% of the staff) including senior finance officials, (Nakash, 1988).…”
Section: The Rise Of Modern Budgetary and Fiscal Institutions In Sudanmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Seven provincial Bait el mals were created and supervised by central Biat el mal at Omdurman, which reports on daily basis to the Khalifa and submits monthly budget as well. Also, to ensure efficiency the Khalifa appointed many foreigners in the administration of the funds (about 30% of the staff) including senior finance officials, (Nakash, 1988).…”
Section: The Rise Of Modern Budgetary and Fiscal Institutions In Sudanmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Malgré la multiplication des champs investis, l'historiographie de la période mahdiste demeure caractérisée, dans la lignée du travail de Peter M. Holt, par une focalisation sur le pouvoir central et sa production normative et prescriptive, que ce soit dans ses aspects symboliques (Searcy 2010), légaux (Layish 2016), fiscaux (Nakash 1988) ou économiques (Saʿīd al-Qaddāl 1986). Quelques travaux se sont cependant attachés à renouveler notre regard sur cette période en se détachant des logiques proprement étatiques pour développer une véritable histoire sociale et économique : c'est le cas de l'ouvrage de Robert S. Kramer sur Omdurman pendant la Mahdiyya (Kramer 2010), ainsi que des travaux d'Iris Seri-Hersch sur les circulations dans la zone frontalière entre le Soudan mahdiste et l'Éthiopie (Seri-Hersch 2010).…”
unclassified