Objectives. To determine the reliability and value of peer-and self -reported evaluations in the grading of pharmacy students. Methods. Mean student peer-and self-reported grades were compared to faculty grades in the advanced pharmacy practice experience (APPE) and seminar presentation courses. Responses from pharmacy school alumni regarding curricular peer-and self-reported evaluations were solicited using an online survey tool. Results. Self-reported student grades were lower than the faculty-reported grade overall and for the formal presentation component of the APPE course grading rubric. Self-reported grades were no different than faculty-reported grades for the seminar course. Students graded their peers higher than did faculty members for both the seminar and APPE courses on all components of the grading rubric. The majority of pharmacy alumni conducted peer-and self-evaluations (64% and 85%, respectively) at least annually and considered peer-and self-evaluations useful in assessing students' work in group projects, oral presentations, and professional skills. Conclusion. The combination of self-, peer-, and faculty-assessments using a detailed grading rubric offers an opportunity to meet accreditation standards and better prepare pharmacy students for their professional careers.Keywords: self-assessment, peer-assessment, grading rubric, evaluation, assessment, advanced pharmacy practice experience
INTRODUCTIONPerformance assessments provided by supervisors or peers in conjunction with self-evaluations are an integral part of a pharmacist's professional development. Self-reflection is an essential part of this process, as it provides insight about how people view themselves and their behaviors relative to peers and supervisors. It also reveals self-assessed strengths and weaknesses, identifies the barriers that must be overcome to surmount limitations, and expresses future opportunities for growth.1-3 Likewise, peer reflection demonstrates strong or poor performance relative to someone on the same level.4 Formal self-assessments in pharmacy school curricula, which is mandated by the Accreditation Council of Pharmacy Education, provides consistent and reliable assessments among faculty members and preceptors.5 Pharmacy educators are in a position to provide consistent and high-quality feedback so that students are able to develop more accurate self-assessments as part of their pharmacy education.6 Previous studies report inconsistent results regarding the value of self-grading and there are a limited number of reports about peer-grading. There are no reports regarding pharmacy alumni perspectives on the value of peer and self-assessment as part of the pharmacy curricula. The objective of the study was to evaluate the reliability and value of peer-and self-reported student evaluations in the grading of pharmacy students by assessing the differences in peer, self, and faculty grades in 2 courses offered at the Ernest Mario School of Pharmacy at Rutgers University.
METHODSThe reliability of peer-and self-ev...