Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications Adjunct 2017
DOI: 10.1145/3131726.3131733
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

First Workshop on Trust in the Age of Automated Driving

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the absence of a human driver (i.e., fully automated vehicle), pedestrians took their crossing decision mainly dependent on the distance of the approaching car, which is in line with the findings of prior investigations (Oxley et al, 2005;Yannis et al, 2013;Moore et al, 2019;Dey et al, 2020c;Holländer et al, 2020b). However, we believe that explicit communication has the potential to enhance trust of automated driving and should therefore not be neglected (Noah et al, 2017;Wintersberger et al, 2018;Holländer et al, 2019b). Projections scored second best for intuitive understanding and slightly exceeded the baseline in the point "Low subjective mental workload."…”
Section: Comprehensibilitysupporting
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the absence of a human driver (i.e., fully automated vehicle), pedestrians took their crossing decision mainly dependent on the distance of the approaching car, which is in line with the findings of prior investigations (Oxley et al, 2005;Yannis et al, 2013;Moore et al, 2019;Dey et al, 2020c;Holländer et al, 2020b). However, we believe that explicit communication has the potential to enhance trust of automated driving and should therefore not be neglected (Noah et al, 2017;Wintersberger et al, 2018;Holländer et al, 2019b). Projections scored second best for intuitive understanding and slightly exceeded the baseline in the point "Low subjective mental workload."…”
Section: Comprehensibilitysupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Previous studies have highlighted that safety (objective and subjective), comprehensibility, and usability are decisive factors when evaluating VRU-AV communication concepts (Noah et al, 2017;Wintersberger et al, 2018). To determine which concepts lead to the most optimal results, we aimed to measure these factors through an immersive virtual reality investigation that simulates a realistic first-person view experience.…”
Section: User Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The industry and academics have been testing methods with the potential to improve levels of trust and acceptance of AVs (Noah et al, 2017). One of these methods is system transparency, when users are presented with information about the status of the system (Lee and See, 2004).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although there are many assumptions made, we still believe the finding of this study will contribute to better user-interface designs for supervised autonomous vehicles. We also expect that further investigation on other important factors [18] in autonomous driving, such as reliance behaviors of drivers with non-drivingrelated activities, will help to enhance our framework to be applicable to autonomous vehicle in general.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%