Abstract:Dippity Pig Syndrome (DPS) is a well-known but rare complex of clinical signs affecting minipigs, which has not been thoroughly investigated yet. Clinically affected animals show acute appearance of red, exudating lesions across the spine. The lesions are painful, evidenced by arching of the back (dipping), and the onset of clinical symptoms is generally sudden. In order to understand the pathogenesis, histological and virological investigations were performed in affected and unaffected Göttingen Minipigs (GöM… Show more
“…For the first time, synthetic gene blocks containing partial sequences of several viruses were used as a positive control 34 . In an extended study analyzing Göttingen minipigs diseased with the dippity pig syndrome as model, 15 viruses were tested including PERV‐A/C 35 (Table 3, screening pig population 3, SSP3). The methods worked and detected PCMV/PRV, PCV1, PCV3, PLHV‐3, and PERV‐A/C in one or more animals.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…SPP3, screening pig population 3, screening Göttingen minipigs with dippity pig syndrome, dark grey 35 …”
BackgroundThe German Xenotransplantation Consortium is in the process to prepare a clinical trial application (CTA) on xenotransplantation of genetically modified pig hearts. In the CTA documents to the central and national regulatory authorities, that is, the European Medicines Agency (EMA) and the Paul Ehrlich Institute (PEI), respectively, it is required to list the potential zoonotic or xenozoonotic porcine microorganisms including porcine viruses as well as to describe methods of detection in order to prevent their transmission. The donor animals should be tested using highly sensitive detection systems. I would like to define a detection system as the complex including the actual detection methods, either PCR‐based, cell‐based, or immunological methods and their sensitivity, as well as sample generation, sample preparation, sample origin, time of sampling, and the necessary negative and positive controls. Lessons learned from the identification of porcine cytomegalovirus/porcine roseolovirus (PCMV/PRV) in the xenotransplanted heart in the recipient in the Baltimore study underline how important such systems are. The question is whether veterinary laboratories can supply such assays.MethodsA total of 35 veterinary laboratories in Germany were surveyed for their ability to test for selected xenotransplantation‐relevant viruses, including PCMV/PRV, hepatitis E virus, and porcine endogenous retrovirus‐C (PERV‐C). As comparison, data from Swiss laboratories and a laboratory in the USA were analyzed. Furthermore, we assessed which viruses were screened for in clinical and preclinical trials performed until now and during screening of pig populations.ResultsOf the nine laboratories that provided viral diagnostics, none of these included all potential viruses of concern, indeed, the most important assays confirmed in recent human trials, antibody detection of PCMV/PRV and screening for PERV‐C were not available at all. The situation was similar in Swiss and US laboratories. Different viruses have been tested for in first clinical and preclinical trials performed in various countries.ConclusionBased on these results it is necessary to establish special virological laboratories able to test for all xenotransplantation‐relevant viruses using validated assays, optimally in the xenotransplantation centers.
“…For the first time, synthetic gene blocks containing partial sequences of several viruses were used as a positive control 34 . In an extended study analyzing Göttingen minipigs diseased with the dippity pig syndrome as model, 15 viruses were tested including PERV‐A/C 35 (Table 3, screening pig population 3, SSP3). The methods worked and detected PCMV/PRV, PCV1, PCV3, PLHV‐3, and PERV‐A/C in one or more animals.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…SPP3, screening pig population 3, screening Göttingen minipigs with dippity pig syndrome, dark grey 35 …”
BackgroundThe German Xenotransplantation Consortium is in the process to prepare a clinical trial application (CTA) on xenotransplantation of genetically modified pig hearts. In the CTA documents to the central and national regulatory authorities, that is, the European Medicines Agency (EMA) and the Paul Ehrlich Institute (PEI), respectively, it is required to list the potential zoonotic or xenozoonotic porcine microorganisms including porcine viruses as well as to describe methods of detection in order to prevent their transmission. The donor animals should be tested using highly sensitive detection systems. I would like to define a detection system as the complex including the actual detection methods, either PCR‐based, cell‐based, or immunological methods and their sensitivity, as well as sample generation, sample preparation, sample origin, time of sampling, and the necessary negative and positive controls. Lessons learned from the identification of porcine cytomegalovirus/porcine roseolovirus (PCMV/PRV) in the xenotransplanted heart in the recipient in the Baltimore study underline how important such systems are. The question is whether veterinary laboratories can supply such assays.MethodsA total of 35 veterinary laboratories in Germany were surveyed for their ability to test for selected xenotransplantation‐relevant viruses, including PCMV/PRV, hepatitis E virus, and porcine endogenous retrovirus‐C (PERV‐C). As comparison, data from Swiss laboratories and a laboratory in the USA were analyzed. Furthermore, we assessed which viruses were screened for in clinical and preclinical trials performed until now and during screening of pig populations.ResultsOf the nine laboratories that provided viral diagnostics, none of these included all potential viruses of concern, indeed, the most important assays confirmed in recent human trials, antibody detection of PCMV/PRV and screening for PERV‐C were not available at all. The situation was similar in Swiss and US laboratories. Different viruses have been tested for in first clinical and preclinical trials performed in various countries.ConclusionBased on these results it is necessary to establish special virological laboratories able to test for all xenotransplantation‐relevant viruses using validated assays, optimally in the xenotransplantation centers.
“…38 Interestingly, it has also been Greek pig 39 and dippity pig syndrome in Göttingen minipigs. 40 It should be mentioned that PCV3 can be found in invertebrates, in ticks and mosquitoes 41,42 which could indicate that these species may serve as a potential transmission vector in the life-cycle of PCV3.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…PCV3 can be found in most pigs on a global basis including wild boars and domestic pigs with or without clinical signs and are often associated with various other coinfections 38 . Interestingly, it has also been associated with unusual syndromes including erythema multiform in a Greek pig 39 and dippity pig syndrome in Göttingen minipigs 40 . It should be mentioned that PCV3 can be found in invertebrates, in ticks and mosquitoes 41,42 which could indicate that these species may serve as a potential transmission vector in the life‐cycle of PCV3.…”
BackgroundAs sequencing is becoming more broadly available, virus discovery continues. Small DNA viruses contribute to up to 60% of the overall virus load in pigs. Porcine circoviruses (PCVs) are small DNA viruses with a single‐stranded circular genome. They are common in pig breeds and have not been properly addressed for their potential risk in xenotransplantation. Whereas PCV1 is non‐pathogenic in pigs, PCV2 has been associated with various disease manifestations. Recently two new circoviruses have been described, PCV3 and PCV4. While PCV4 is currently present mainly in Asia, PCV3 is widely distributed, and has been identified in commercial pigs, wild boars, and pigs generated for xenotransplantation. In one case PCV3 was transmitted by pigs to baboons via heart transplantation. PCV3 pathogenicity in pigs was controversial initially, however, the virus was found to be associated with porcine dermatitis and nephropathy syndrome (PDNS), reproductive failure, and multisystemic inflammation. Inoculation studies with PCV3 infectious clones confirmed that PCV3 is pathogenic. Most importantly, recently discovered human circoviruses (CV) are closely related to PCV3.MethodsLiterature was evaluated and summarized. A dendrogram of existing circoviruses in pigs, humans, and other animal species was created and assessed at the species level.ResultsWe found that human circoviruses can be divided into three species, human CV1, CV2, and CV3. Human CV2 and CV3 are closest to PCV3.ConclusionsCircoviruses are ubiquitous. This communication should create awareness of PCV3 and the newly discovered human circoviruses, which may be a problem for blood transfusions and xenotransplantation in immune suppressed individuals.
“…Therefore, these animals were carefully screened for different xenotransplantation-relevant viruses [17][18][19][20][21][22][23]. AAV were not screened until now in Göttingen Minipigs, and they are not included into the list of viruses "not permitted in swine with designated pathogen-free status" to be used in xenotransplantation published by Fishman [24].…”
Adenovirus associated viruses (AAV) are well established in clinical trials for in vivo gene therapy. The AAV vector has unique features that are beneficial in clinical applications including broad tropism, low immunogenicity, ease of production, it is non-pathogenic, rarely integrates into the host chromosome and results in long-term expression of the transgene. Göttingen Minipigs are a well-established animal model for several diseases and can be used for efficacy and safety testing of AAV based gene therapy. Antibodies against AAV may influence the results and therefore the animals should be tested beforehand for the presence of antibodies against AAV. The detection of AAV in pig breeds is also important for the virus safety of xenotransplantation. Although the contribution of AAVs to diseases in humans is still under discussion, it cannot be excluded that transfer of AAVs from the donor may result in disease. When we screened Göttingen Minipigs from Ellegaard Göttingen Minipigs A/S, Denmark, and Marshall BioResources, USA, for AAV1, AAV2, AAV6, AAV9, only low titers of neutralizing antibodies (NAb) were detected despite higher titers of total antibodies (TAb). This data indicates that Göttingen Minipigs are well suited for gene therapy studies as well as for xenotransplantation.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.