2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.astropartphys.2016.11.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

First upper limits on the radar cross section of cosmic-ray induced extensive air showers

Abstract: TARA (Telescope Array Radar) is a cosmic ray radar detection experiment colocated with Telescope Array, the conventional surface scintillation detector (SD) and fluorescence telescope detector (FD) near Delta, Utah, U.S.A. The TARA detector combines a 40 kW, 54.1 MHz VHF transmitter and high-gain transmitting antenna which broadcasts the radar carrier over the SD array and within the FD field of view, towards a 250 MS/s DAQ receiver. TARA has been collecting data since 2013 with the primary goal of observing t… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

5
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Ultimately, those signals were determined to be from meteors, which ionize similar, far denser trails in the upper atmosphere. After several experimental efforts (including the Telescope Array RAdar (TARA)) failed to detect UHECR via radar [18][19][20][21], and theoretical work explaining the lack of observed reflections [22,23], the in-air method was finally deemed not viable due to short ionization lifetimes in the atmosphere at EAS altitudes, and damping from collisions between ionized electrons and neutral air molecules (an issue first raised by Eckersley in 1941 [17], though largely subsequently ignored. )…”
Section: History Theory and Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ultimately, those signals were determined to be from meteors, which ionize similar, far denser trails in the upper atmosphere. After several experimental efforts (including the Telescope Array RAdar (TARA)) failed to detect UHECR via radar [18][19][20][21], and theoretical work explaining the lack of observed reflections [22,23], the in-air method was finally deemed not viable due to short ionization lifetimes in the atmosphere at EAS altitudes, and damping from collisions between ionized electrons and neutral air molecules (an issue first raised by Eckersley in 1941 [17], though largely subsequently ignored. )…”
Section: History Theory and Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, doubt was cast upon the method's feasibility due to the suppression of the return signal by collisional damping effects. The method was revived again in the early 2000's by theoretical works [12] followed by experiment [13]. These efforts came to an end once limits were set on the effective scattering cross-section of an in-air particle cascade by the TARA collaboration, as well as theoretical advances, leading to the conclusion that the technique not feasible to probe air showers [14].…”
Section: From Beam Test To In-nature Neutrino Detectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It was theorized that these echoes could be from radar reflecting from the charged tracks left behind as a cosmic ray produces a cascade in the atmosphere. It turns out that these particular echoes were actually caused by meteors, but the idea took hold, and multiple experimental efforts to date have searched for radar reflections from UHE cosmic rays [9][10][11][12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%