2009
DOI: 10.1002/bdra.20627
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

First trimester paroxetine use and the prevalence of congenital, specifically cardiac, defects: A meta‐analysis of epidemiological studies

Abstract: This meta-analysis found little evidence of publication bias or overall statistical heterogeneity and only weak evidence of associations with some study characteristics. Although subject to limitations, the summary estimate indicates an increased prevalence of combined cardiac defects with first trimester paroxetine use. The summary estimate also indicates an increased prevalence of aggregated congenital defects with paroxetine; however, this association may be explained, in part, by the increased prevalence o… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

7
100
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 137 publications
(108 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
7
100
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Note, however, that this was not a consistent finding, as our main analysis, which was with the higher quality studies, was not significant, although it was reduced to 4 studies. Several meta-analyses previously did report an increased risk for cardiovascular malformations with paroxetine (ie, Bar-Oz et al, 13 Wurst et al 16 ) but, unlike Wurst et al, 16 we did not find an increased risk for congenital malformations with this drug. Ours is the first meta-analysis, to our knowledge, to specifically examine the type of malformation implicated, and our results suggest that septal heart defects are associated with antidepressant exposure.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 75%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Note, however, that this was not a consistent finding, as our main analysis, which was with the higher quality studies, was not significant, although it was reduced to 4 studies. Several meta-analyses previously did report an increased risk for cardiovascular malformations with paroxetine (ie, Bar-Oz et al, 13 Wurst et al 16 ) but, unlike Wurst et al, 16 we did not find an increased risk for congenital malformations with this drug. Ours is the first meta-analysis, to our knowledge, to specifically examine the type of malformation implicated, and our results suggest that septal heart defects are associated with antidepressant exposure.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 75%
“…Several have found no evidence of increased risk of major congenital malformations above the baseline [8][9][10] rate, which has been widely cited as 1%-3% for any pregnancy in North America [11][12][13][14] and less than 4% for minor congenital malformations. 15 The most recent meta-analyses did report an increased risk for congenital malformations 16 and cardiac malformations 13,16 with paroxetine exposure specifically. Unfortunately, many individual studies have serious methodological limitations 17 that were not taken into account in the previous meta-analyses.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…13,19 A meta-analysis estimated a 50% increased prevalence of cardiac defects overall with first trimester paroxetine use. 21 It has remained unclear, however, whether these associations are causal, or due to systematic error or chance.…”
Section: Conclusion-resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Results from a recent metaanalysis including 20 publications indicate an increased prevalence of combined heart defects associated with first-trimester paroxetine use (Wurst et al, 2009). They also found that variability among individual study findings might be associated with data source, type of publication, and age at ascertainment.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%