Abstract:Acute patellar dislocations can result in patellar instability, pain, recurrent dislocations, decreased level of sporting activity, and patellofemoral arthritis. The initial management of a first-time traumatic patellar dislocation is controversial with no evidence-based consensus to guide decision making. Most first-time traumatic patellar dislocations have been traditionally treated nonoperatively; however, there has been a recent trend in initial surgical management. We performed a systematic review of Leve… Show more
“…Traumatic lateral patellar dislocation (LPD) is a common injury in young, physically active adults 16,19,23 . It is the second most common cause of hemarthrosis of the knee.…”
“…Traumatic lateral patellar dislocation (LPD) is a common injury in young, physically active adults 16,19,23 . It is the second most common cause of hemarthrosis of the knee.…”
“…[11][12][13][14][15][16] Patellar dislocation is arguably an exception, as is the grossly unstable knee. 1,[17][18][19][20] Management of these patients is undertaken in different clinical environments by various health care providers. For many acute injuries, the initial presentation for medical care occurs in the emergency department (ED).…”
Background: Evidence-based guidelines on the use of immobilization in the management of common acute soft-tissue knee injuries do not exist. Our objective was to explore the practice patterns of emergency physicians (EPs), sports medicine physicians (SMPs) and orthopedic surgeons (OS) regarding the use of early immobilization in the management of these injuries.
Methods:We developed a web-based survey and sent it to all EPs, SMPs and OS in a Canadian urban centre. The survey was designed to assess the likelihood of prescribing immobilization and to evaluate factors associated with physicians from these 3 disciplines making this decision.
Results:The overall response rate was 44 of 112 (39%): 17 of 58 (29%) EPs, 7 of 15 (47%) SMPs and 20 of 39 (51%) OS. In cases of suspected meniscus injuries, 9 (50%) EPs indicated they would prescribe immobilization, whereas no SMPs and 1 (5%) OS would immobilize (p = 0.002). For suspected anterior cruciate ligament injuries, 13 (77%) EPs, 2 (29%) SMPs and 5 (25%) OS said they would immobilize (p = 0.005). For lateral collateral ligament injuries, 9 (53%) EPs, no SMPs and 6 (32%) OS would immobilize (p = 0.04). All respondents would prescribe immobilization for a grossly unstable knee.
Conclusion:We found that EPs were are more likely to prescribe immobilization for certain acute soft-tissue knee injuries than SMPs and OS. The development of an evidenced-based guideline for the use of knee immobilization after acute soft-tissue injury may reduce practice variability.Contexte : Il n'existe pas de lignes directrices factuelles sur le recours à l'immo bilisation pour la prise en charge des traumatismes aigus communs qui affectent les tissus mous du genou. Notre objectif était d'explorer les habitudes de pratique des urgentologues, des médecins du sport et des chirurgiens orthopédistes quant au recours à l'immobilisation pour la prise en charge initiale de ces blessures.Méthodes : Nous avons conçu un sondage Web et l'avons fait parvenir à tous les urgentologues, médecins du sport et chirurgiens orthopédistes d'un centre urbain canadien. Le sondage visait à évaluer la probabilité que l'immobilisation soit prescrite et à dégager les facteurs associés à ce type de décision chez les praticiens de ces 3 disciplines.
“…29 3% of all knee injuries. Females are more likely to be affected than males (Fithian, 2004) 69 with patellar dislocations being the second most common reason for knee haemarthrosis 70 (Stefancin and Parker, 2007). A number of factors predisposing patients to patellar 71 dislocation have been identified in the literature (see Table 1 …”
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.