First Steps: Exploring Use of a Prospective, Office-Based Registry as the Foundation for Quality Improvement in Cardiology Training

Abstract

Background Teaching practice-based learning and improvement and systems-based practice are challenging. Cardiology fellows at St John Hospital & Medical Center participate in a national registry of outpatient cardiology care. Objective We assessed the use of the registry, hypothesizing that it could serve as an effective foundation for studying ambulatory care, identifying gaps in care, and planning interventions to advance competence in practice-based learning and improvement and systems-based practice. Methods Starting in 2009, trainees prospectively entered data for ambulatory cardiac patients into the PINNACLE Registry database where compliance with 28 performance measures was calculated and reported quarterly. Fellows met with the program director individually and in groups to identify performance gaps and to develop and implement plans for quality improvement. Cardiology fellows were surveyed annually to assess this process. Results Through March 2012, the fellows had completed 2400 patient visits. Participation was feasible because it was cost neutral, with data form completion averaging 5 minutes. It was acceptable, with most fellows describing positive effects on practice-based learning and improvement without significant detriment to work flow. Performance achievement for drug therapies ranged from 69% (77 of 111) of the patients with atrial fibrillation receiving anticoagulation to 99% (486 of 489) of patients with coronary disease receiving lipid-lowering therapy. Gaps in system performance included low levels for diabetes screening (5%; 20 of 422) and lipid monitoring (10%; 58 of 573). Initial quality improvement projects addressed practice gaps with straightforward solutions. Improving system performance was more challenging. Conclusions Using a registry in cardiology trainees' outpatient practice is feasible, acceptable, and valuable. It allows for planning and studying the effects of quality improvement projects.

Feasibility of Using Electronic Medical Record Data for Tracking Quality Indicators in Adults with Congenital Heart Disease

“…Recognizing many of the limitations and uncertainties of dichotomizing health care decision making, it is important to note that quality of care can only be assessed if the QIs are usable and feasible to collect by the average practitioner seeing ACHD patients. Data extraction from patients' electronic medical record (EMR) is one method of potentially feasible data collection and has been successful in other areas of cardiology …”

“…Data extraction from patients' electronic medical record (EMR) is one method of potentially feasible data collection and has been successful in other areas of cardiology. 5 We previously participated in a multicenter effort to gather EMR data for registry purposes, and gained familiarity with many of the obstacles for this methodology. 6 The project provided first-hand experience with the complexities of EMR data and interinstitutional heterogeneity, particularly for ACHD due to the diversity of anatomic diagnoses and the chronicity of the condition.…”

Educating the MACRA-Ready Cardiologist

“…This may help prepare FITs to acquire credit for several improvement activities (8,9). FITs should next be able utilize health information technology to receive credit for and improve the quality of care they are delivering.…”