2018 Conference on Precision Electromagnetic Measurements (CPEM 2018) 2018
DOI: 10.1109/cpem.2018.8500904
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

First Results Using the Planck-Balance

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The relative measurement uncertainty of using an apparatus, as presented in [1,2,6,7] for mass/force determination, can roughly be estimated by equation (5), which can be derived from equation (4) by the standard uncertainty propagation. The uncertainty of the optical power measurements primarily depends on the relative measurement uncertainties of the mass, gravitational acceleration, and reflectivity value of the ultra-high reflective mirror.…”
Section: Interpretation Of the Traceability Route Of The Photon-momen...mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The relative measurement uncertainty of using an apparatus, as presented in [1,2,6,7] for mass/force determination, can roughly be estimated by equation (5), which can be derived from equation (4) by the standard uncertainty propagation. The uncertainty of the optical power measurements primarily depends on the relative measurement uncertainties of the mass, gravitational acceleration, and reflectivity value of the ultra-high reflective mirror.…”
Section: Interpretation Of the Traceability Route Of The Photon-momen...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Under the multi-reflection configuration, the total net force was amplified by at least an order of magnitude in comparison with the single reflection configuration. Furthermore, using single-and multi-reflection configurations, a possible standard for the force calibration, or the inverse, a standard for optical (laser) power calibration with direct traceability to the recently renewed SI base units, has already been proposed [2,[5][6][7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this section, several error sources shown in Figure 2 are investigated by using the theoretical equation and/or numerical simulations. The values of most of the parameters used for the numerical experiments have been chosen according to real measurement data [7].…”
Section: Influences On the Amplitude Estimationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here, D is given by Eqs. (8) and (13) for the three-parameter sine fit and the multiharmonic sine fit, respectively. n denotes the noise level of measurement.…”
Section: Uncertainty Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The total harmonic distortion is 0.15 %. These parameters are obtained according to real measurement data [8]. In order to simulate the non-coherent sampling, the signal frequency fsig is changed from 3.82 Hz to 4.02 Hz with the same number of samples M = 10 4 , i.e., the sampling frequency fs = 1 kHz and the sampling time T = 10 s. For each fsig, a data set of induced voltage       is generated and taken as the nominal points.…”
Section: Numerical Simulation Of the Relative Bias Of The Amplitudementioning
confidence: 99%