2018
DOI: 10.1002/2017jd027791
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

First Reprocessing of Southern Hemisphere ADditional OZonesondes Profile Records: 3. Uncertainty in Ozone Profile and Total Column

Abstract: Reprocessed ozonesonde data from eight SHADOZ (Southern Hemisphere ADditional OZonesondes) sites have been used to derive the first analysis of uncertainty estimates for both profile and total column ozone (TCO). The ozone uncertainty is a composite of the uncertainties of the individual terms in the ozone partial pressure (PO3) equation, those being the ozone sensor current, background current, internal pump temperature, pump efficiency factors, conversion efficiency, and flow rate. Overall, PO3 uncertainties… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
87
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

4
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 75 publications
(92 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
5
87
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is encouraging that the independently calculated uncertainty in total column (4.4%, 4.2%, 4.1%, and 4.2% -from Section 5) is very similar to the standard deviation of the comparison with the Dobson (4.8%, 5.5%, 4.6%, and 5.0% -from Section 6). These uncertainties agree with the total 25 column uncertainties determined for the entire reprocessed SHADOZ dataset, that includes our three tropical stations plus 11 additional sites (Thompson et al, 2017;Witte et al, 2017b). Although the uncertainty does not fully capture the Dobson comparison standard deviation, it should be noted that no filtering (besides in the cases of known instrument failures) was conducted on the NOAA ozonesonde record.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 71%
“…It is encouraging that the independently calculated uncertainty in total column (4.4%, 4.2%, 4.1%, and 4.2% -from Section 5) is very similar to the standard deviation of the comparison with the Dobson (4.8%, 5.5%, 4.6%, and 5.0% -from Section 6). These uncertainties agree with the total 25 column uncertainties determined for the entire reprocessed SHADOZ dataset, that includes our three tropical stations plus 11 additional sites (Thompson et al, 2017;Witte et al, 2017b). Although the uncertainty does not fully capture the Dobson comparison standard deviation, it should be noted that no filtering (besides in the cases of known instrument failures) was conducted on the NOAA ozonesonde record.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 71%
“…Vertical resolution is 250 m.10.1029/2018JD030098Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres the measured signal. This is similar to the results inWitte et al (2018) that reported on ozone uncertainties in the reprocessed tropical Southern Hemisphere Additional Ozonesondes data set andSterling et al (2018) that presented uncertainty estimates for profiles at eight NOAA ozonesonde stations.…”
supporting
confidence: 90%
“…The uncertainty is less than 1% throughout the profile. We use the Witte et al (2018) formulation to compute the uncertainties in TCO. Figure 9 shows an applications-based example of the time series of WFF reprocessed sonde TCO ± ΔTCO to evaluate the EP-TOMS and OMI overpass data.…”
Section: Uncertainties In the Wff Reprocessed Ozone Recordsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All sites use electrochemical concentration cell (ECC) ozonesondes that rely on the potassium iodide electrochemical detection of O3, and which provide a vertical resolution of about 100 m (Komhyr, 1969). The associated uncertainty is usually ± (5-10 %) (Tarasick et al, 2019a;Thompson et al, 2019;Witte et al, 2018). ATom.…”
Section: -52mentioning
confidence: 99%