“…Three subclades were present within Trichuris family: (1) the first subclade where our strain was clustered with T. arvicolae isolated from Myodes glareolus ( Arvicolidae ) from Spain with the highest identity (98.9%) (Rocío Callejón et al, 2013 ), and T. muris with 96.3% identity ( Blaxter et al, 1998 ) in an independent cluster, the following cluster includes T. vulpis isolated from Canis lupus familiaris from Spain with 97.9% identity (Rocío Callejón et al, 2013 ) , T. vulpis from dogs in Thailand with 97.7% ( Areekul et al, 2010 ) and T. fossor isolated from Thamomyes spp. in the United States (94.3%) ( Hughes et al, 2020 ); (2) the second subclade including T. skrjabini , isolated from Capra hircus in Spain (95.9%) (Rocío Callejón et al, 2013 ) , T. leporis from Lepus europaeus from Spain (95.7%) (Rocío Callejón et al, 2013 ) , T. ovis from Capra hercus from Spain (95.8%) (Rocío Callejón et al, 2013 ) and T. discolor secluded from Bos Taurus from Spain (95.8%) (Rocío Callejón et al, 2013 ); (3) the third subclade includes T. suis secluded from Sus scrofa domestica in Spain and Netherlands (94.2%) ( Holterman et al, 2006 ; Rocío Callejón et al, 2013 ) , respectively, and T. trichura isolated from Thailand and Edinburg ( Will, 2005 , Areekul et al, 2010 ) , respectively with 92.6% identity. The highest resemblance scores for personated kinds were found among T. ovis and T. discolor (99.8%).…”