2015
DOI: 10.5248/130.337
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

First records of some Asian macromycetes in Africa

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, effective identification can be limited by certain morphological characteristics as well as the different environmental conditions that affect those morphological characteristics. Over the last two decades, molecular phylogeny has been an essential tool in the identification of Volvariella species [3,4,6,10,[17][18][19]21,[32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39]. Thus, the current classification of the genus Volvariella has been based on the combined data of the morphological characteristics and molecular data.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, effective identification can be limited by certain morphological characteristics as well as the different environmental conditions that affect those morphological characteristics. Over the last two decades, molecular phylogeny has been an essential tool in the identification of Volvariella species [3,4,6,10,[17][18][19]21,[32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39]. Thus, the current classification of the genus Volvariella has been based on the combined data of the morphological characteristics and molecular data.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The latter two species differ from X. necopinatus in having comparatively larger and wider basidiospores ( Heinemann and Little Flower 1984 , Daniëls et al 2015 ). Xanthagaricus epipastus has an olive yellow to olivaceous squamulose pileus, and slightly wider basidiospores (3.7–4.7 × 2.8–3.4 µm) with lower Q value (avg.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… subepipastus (3.7–4.7 × 2.8–3.4) and X. viridulus (3.8–5.0 × 2.9–3.6 µm) ( Heinemann and Little Flower 1984 , Heinemann and Rammeloo 1986 , Daniëls et al 2015 ). Furthermore, X.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%