1997
DOI: 10.1080/00785326.1997.10432880
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

First record of Acanthocephala in marine copepods

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
16
0
1

Year Published

2000
2000
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
16
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This presently causes a problem in the taxonomy of the genus (Clément & Moore 1995, 2000 (Soyer 1972, Huys & Bodin 1997, Clément & Moore 2000, Karanovic & Pesce 2001, Wells 2007, Huys 2009, Boxshall et al 2010, Sua´rez-Morales & Fuentes-Reinés 2015 are provided in Table 1. In most Halectinosoma species, the armature formula of the antennary exopod is a typical ''1.1.2'', but the seta on the first segment is known to be absent in several species as well as H. foveolata (see Table 1).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This presently causes a problem in the taxonomy of the genus (Clément & Moore 1995, 2000 (Soyer 1972, Huys & Bodin 1997, Clément & Moore 2000, Karanovic & Pesce 2001, Wells 2007, Huys 2009, Boxshall et al 2010, Sua´rez-Morales & Fuentes-Reinés 2015 are provided in Table 1. In most Halectinosoma species, the armature formula of the antennary exopod is a typical ''1.1.2'', but the seta on the first segment is known to be absent in several species as well as H. foveolata (see Table 1).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The genus Halectinosoma Vervoort, 1962 is a large group composed of about 70 nominal species within the family Ectinosomatidae (Soyer 1972, Huys & Bodin 1997, Clément & Moore 2000, Karanovic & Pesce 2001, Wells 2007, Huys 2009, Boxshall et al 2010, Sua´rez-Morales & Fuentes-Reinés 2015. The name of this genus was first proposed as a subgenus of the genus Ectinosoma Boeck, 1865 by Lang (1944), and Vervoort's (1962) consequently designated Ectinosoma (Halectinosoma) sarsi Boeck, 1873 as the type species of the subgenus (Sua´rez-Morales & FuentesReinés 2015).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This genus is in deed much closer to the genus Pseudobradya than to Ectinosoma, from which it was segregated. One of the characters that is traditionally used to distinguish Ha lectinosoma from Pseudobradya is the condensed maxillary endopodite in the former (Huys & Bodin 1997). Also, the position of the inner setae on the maxillary basis can be used as a very good distingui shing character between these two genera (they are al ways situated near the top of the basis in Pseudobra dya).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the detailed morphology is qui te conservative within the genus, some of its species have obviously been misplaced and should be referred to other genera. One of them, H. porosum Wells, 1967, was formally transfered to the genus Ectinosoma by Huys & Bodin (1997). Some others probably belong to unde scribed genera, which we will discuss later.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Th e urgent need of revision of these genera is substantially hampered by the lack of type material and by the fact that some unverifi able descriptions undoubtedly contain important errors (Wells 2007). Recent work has demonstrated that some descriptions contain important observational errors and, consequently, some species have been attributed to the wrong genus Moore 1995, 2000;Huys and Bodin 1997;Clément and Ólafsson 2001;Wells 2007). Th e recent recognition of species complexes (Clément and Moore 1995, 2000, 2007 refl ects the previous ignorance of characters that have not been given the attention they deserved, such as mouthpart features and body ornamentation patterns.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%