2013
DOI: 10.2517/1342-8144-17.4.317
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

First Record of a Primitive Radiolitid Rudist from Japan

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

1
23
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
1
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This new genus is proposed to embrace the distinctive grouping of south‐west Asian to Japanese radiolitid species that are characterized by a compact (non‐celluloprismatic) outer shell layer and which were formerly attributed to Eoradiolites by Masse and Gallo Maresca () and Sano and Masse (). Despite showing a similar configuration of radial bands to that in Eoradiolites , Auroradiolites differs from the former genus in its possession of the following characters: (1) an entirely compact fibrous prismatic, as opposed to celluloprismatic ol in the RV (contrary to the erroneous description of polygonal cells in a specimen of A. gilgitensis by Skelton, in Pudsey et al .…”
Section: Systematic Palaeontologymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…This new genus is proposed to embrace the distinctive grouping of south‐west Asian to Japanese radiolitid species that are characterized by a compact (non‐celluloprismatic) outer shell layer and which were formerly attributed to Eoradiolites by Masse and Gallo Maresca () and Sano and Masse (). Despite showing a similar configuration of radial bands to that in Eoradiolites , Auroradiolites differs from the former genus in its possession of the following characters: (1) an entirely compact fibrous prismatic, as opposed to celluloprismatic ol in the RV (contrary to the erroneous description of polygonal cells in a specimen of A. gilgitensis by Skelton, in Pudsey et al .…”
Section: Systematic Palaeontologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…B–C can be excluded from the species as suggested above. In this respect, A. biconvexus also differs from the type species of the genus, A. gilgitensis (Douvillé, ), in which the LV is considered to be ‘not strongly convex’ (Sano and Masse , p. 320). The latter species, moreover, lacks any clear indication of the radial undulations of the ol inner margin seen in A. biconvexus (Sano and Masse ; see also Fig.…”
Section: Systematic Palaeontologymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…gr. gilgitensis (Douvillé) (Masse and Gallo‐Maresca ; Sano and Masse ), Radiolites ? costata Scott (Scott, ) and the genus Gorjanovicia (Polsak, ), are considered to be valid members of the Radiolitidae.…”
Section: Systematic Palaeontologymentioning
confidence: 99%