2016
DOI: 10.1080/00222933.2016.1193646
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

First record of a non-pollinating fig wasp (Hymenoptera: Sycophaginae) from Dominican amber, with estimation of the size of its host figs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 476 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is probably best explained by the recent diversification of this section. The presence of an Idarnes species in Dominican amber indicates that the Sycophaginae are associated with Ficus section Americanae for at least 15-20 Ma (Farache et al, 2016).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This is probably best explained by the recent diversification of this section. The presence of an Idarnes species in Dominican amber indicates that the Sycophaginae are associated with Ficus section Americanae for at least 15-20 Ma (Farache et al, 2016).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to the constraints imposed by these plant traits, NPFWs may oviposit preferentially in a fig tree to which they are better adapted. Indeed, NPFW species exhibit variable ovipositor lengths and structures, which correlate both with trophic ecology and phenotypic characteristics of the figs, such as wall thickness (Elias et al, 2017;Farache et al, 2016;Ghara et al, 2011;Zhen et al, 2005). Thus, such morphological variation may be related to host specialization.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A putative member of Pteromalidae, Parviformosus wohlrabeae Barling, Heads & Martill, 2013, was described from limestone originating from the Crato formation, dated to the Aptian period, about 110 mya. Because of its age, it might be considered as one of the oldest known fossils of Chalcidoidea, but evidence for its placement is ambiguous because none of the diagnostic features of Chalcidoidea was preserved (Barling, Heads & Martill, 2013;Farache et al, 2016). It was placed within Pteromalidae only because of a putative habitus resemblance to Sycophaginae (now Agaonidae sensu Heraty et al, 2013).…”
Section: Manuscript To Be Reviewedmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Numerous chalcidoid fossils have been reported from different amber deposits (Grimaldi & Engel, 2005;Penney, 2010), but few of them have been formally described. Most described chalcidoids stem from young (Eocene and Miocene) deposits, which already host an astonishing phylogenetic diversity of taxa (Darling, 1996;Gibson, 2008Gibson, , 2009Gibson, , 2013Engel, 2009;Engel, McKellar & Huber, 2013;Heraty & Darling, 2009;Compton et al, 2010;Krogmann, 2013;Simutnik, Perkovsky & Gumovsky, 2014;Bläser, Krogmann & Peters, 2015;Burks et al, 2015;Farache et al, 2016). It is believed that most chalcidoid families diversified after the Upper Cretaceous (Heraty et al, 2013;Peters et al 2018) during a period that falls within a major gap in the chalcidoid fossil record, from which only few taxa have been described or even discovered (Burks et al 2015;Heraty & Darling, 2009;Penney, 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Barling et al (2013) already mentioned in their description that "Familial placement for P. wohlrabeae is extremely difficult due to the lack of three key taxonomic structures; the legs, wings and antennae." Moreover, Farache et al (2016) were also skeptical about the phylogenetic positioning of P. wohlrabeae and even questioned whether it should be placed in Chalcidoidea. Even Barling (2018) questioned the validity of the placement of P. wohlrabeae.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%