2006
DOI: 10.1103/physrevlett.97.087210
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

First-Principles Theory of Quantum Well Resonance in Double Barrier Magnetic Tunnel Junctions

Abstract: Quantum well (QW) resonances in Fe(001)/MgO/Fe/MgO/Fe double barrier magnetic tunnel junctions are calculated from first principles. By including the Coulomb blockade energy due to the finite size islands of the middle Fe film, we confirm that the oscillatory differential resistance observed in a recent experiment [T. Nozaki, Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 027208 (2006)10.1103/PhysRevLett.96.027208] originates from the QW resonances from the Delta1 band of the Fe majority-spin channel. The primary source of smearing at … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

2
33
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
2
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The well-defined oscillations of the differential conductance indicate the presence of resonant transmission through QWSs formed in the central Fe 2 layer. The observed oscillation period is around 300 mV and is in rough agreement with the predictions for DMTJs with a 5 nm central layer [23]. QWSs are more pronounced for positive biases (when electrons tunnel from the bottom to the upper electrodes) for DMTJ1 and DMTJ2 and, as could be expected from the barrier asymmetry, are more pronounced for negative bias for DMTJ3.…”
supporting
confidence: 86%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The well-defined oscillations of the differential conductance indicate the presence of resonant transmission through QWSs formed in the central Fe 2 layer. The observed oscillation period is around 300 mV and is in rough agreement with the predictions for DMTJs with a 5 nm central layer [23]. QWSs are more pronounced for positive biases (when electrons tunnel from the bottom to the upper electrodes) for DMTJ1 and DMTJ2 and, as could be expected from the barrier asymmetry, are more pronounced for negative bias for DMTJ3.…”
supporting
confidence: 86%
“…Double-barrier magnetic tunnel junctions (DMTJs), with either nanoparticles [22,23] or a continuous magnetic layer as the central electrode [24], have some advantages in comparison with MTJs. First, they show an enhanced tunnel magnetoresistance (TMR) [24,25], which additionally reveals oscillations induced by quantum well states (QWSs) [23,26]. Second, spin accumulation in the central layer is expected to substantially enhance spin torque [27,28].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Thus, we calculated QW state positions in the energy-thickness plane using the socalled PAM, 26 where electrons inside the CoFeB free layer are confined in a potential well of width t fl [Figs. 1(c) and 1(d)].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[1][2][3][4][5] Besides single barrier MTJs (SBMTJs), double barrier MTJs (DBMTJs) have also been extensively studied for the novel physical phenomena and potential applications in spintronic devices. [6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14] With a thin ferromagnetic (FM) layer sandwiched by two MgO layers, quantum well oscillations and Coulomb blockade phenomena have been reported. 7,8,[12][13][14] Compared with SBMTJs, DBMTJs have larger V 1/2 (voltage where TMR decreases to its half maximum value), 6,[9][10][11] which is desirable for practical applications.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%