2018 IEEE International Magnetics Conference (INTERMAG) 2018
DOI: 10.1109/intmag.2018.8508731
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

First-principles Study of Spin-Wave Dispersion in Sm(FeCo)12

Abstract: We present spin-wave dispersion in Sm(Fe 1−x Co x ) 12 calculated based on firstprinciples. Anisotropy in the lowest branch of the spin-wave dispersion around the Γ point is discussed. Spin-waves propagate more easily along a * -axis than along c * -axis, especially in SmFe 12 . We also compare values of the spin-wave stiffness with those obtained from an experiment. The calculated values are in good agreement with the experimental values.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The material parameters are taken from our DFT values and ref. [43]. The saturation magnetization (μ 0 M s ), the magnetocrystalline anisotropy constant ( K 1 ), and the exchange stiffness ( A ) were 1.48 T, 4.76 MJ m −3 and 9.5 PJ m −1 for Sm 0.75 Y 0.25 (Fe 0.8 Co 0.2 ) 11.25 Ti 0.75 , 1.47 T, 5.11 MJ m −3 and 9.6 PJ m −1 for Sm 0.8 Y 0.2 (Fe 0.8 Co 0.2 ) 11.25 Ti 0.75 , 1.49 T, 4.48 MJ m −3 and 9.4 PJ m −1 for Sm 0.7 Y 0.3 (Fe 0.8 Co 0.2 ) 11.25 Ti 0.75 , respectively.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The material parameters are taken from our DFT values and ref. [43]. The saturation magnetization (μ 0 M s ), the magnetocrystalline anisotropy constant ( K 1 ), and the exchange stiffness ( A ) were 1.48 T, 4.76 MJ m −3 and 9.5 PJ m −1 for Sm 0.75 Y 0.25 (Fe 0.8 Co 0.2 ) 11.25 Ti 0.75 , 1.47 T, 5.11 MJ m −3 and 9.6 PJ m −1 for Sm 0.8 Y 0.2 (Fe 0.8 Co 0.2 ) 11.25 Ti 0.75 , 1.49 T, 4.48 MJ m −3 and 9.4 PJ m −1 for Sm 0.7 Y 0.3 (Fe 0.8 Co 0.2 ) 11.25 Ti 0.75 , respectively.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The mesh size was 2 × 2 × 2 nm3 . The material parameters are taken from our DFT values and ref [43]…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To handle this issue, Hasegawa and Yanase pioneered a simple approach by treating the f electrons as core electrons, namely the 4f-in-core approximation. [27][28][29][30][31] For the purpose of alleviating the computational load and avoiding the problematic nature of the 4f shell electrons in monolayer NdN 2 , the 4f-in-core approximation was adopted in this study. The pseudopotential for the Nd atom containing 11 electrons was used, and the 5s 2 5p 6 5d 1 6s 2 valence-electron configuration was considered.…”
Section: Computational Detailsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The method used in our approaches is general and can be applied for other systems. For example, similar calculations have also been carried out for the magnets SmCo 5 [77] and SmFe 12 [78]. ( ) ( )…”
Section: Anisotropy Of Exchange Stiffness Constantmentioning
confidence: 99%