2009
DOI: 10.1380/ejssnt.2009.681
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

First Principles Study of Cu-Embedded Ni(110) Surfaces

Abstract: The atomic geometries and electronic band structures of Cu-embedded Ni(110) surfaces were studied theoretically. First principles calculation with spin-resolved local density functional theory was applied to the Ni(110) surface, and one to four Cu-embedded Ni(110) surfaces in the 2×2 surface unit cell. The optimized structures for the Ni(110) surface showed that interlayer spacing between the first and the second layer shrunk 11.1% of the bulk distance, but the second and third layer spacing expanded by 2.9% i… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
(35 reference statements)
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…6(a). The width of the 3d -derived bands at the surface layer was about 3.3 eV compared to 4.8 eV for the bulk Ni, again slightly narrowed due to the lack of counterpart, as discussed previously [12]. The PDOS at the top Ni sites for align, stagger, and separate are compared in Fig.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 56%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…6(a). The width of the 3d -derived bands at the surface layer was about 3.3 eV compared to 4.8 eV for the bulk Ni, again slightly narrowed due to the lack of counterpart, as discussed previously [12]. The PDOS at the top Ni sites for align, stagger, and separate are compared in Fig.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 56%
“…We first recalculated the Ni(110) surface and compared it to our previous study because we adopted an improved functional here [12]. Our calculation showed the layer spacing between the first to the second (d 12 ) shrunk by -10.48%, which is slightly improved from -11.10% in the previous calculation.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 73%