First Principles of Racial Equality: History and the Politics and Diplomacy of Human Rights Provisions in the United Nations Charter

Lauren, Paul Gordon

doi:10.2307/761870

Cited by 27 publications

(5 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…On the pluralization of political agency at this time see Hale (2011). 50 See extensive analysis in Lauren (1983); Lockwood (1984); Layton (2000); Skrentny (2002); Borstelmann (2009); Jensen (2016). 51 See St. Joseph Stock Yards Co. v. United States, 298 U.S. 38 (1936) 52 See the seminal case Ridge v Baldwin [1964] AC 40 53 The concept of constitutional rights in UK public law appeared in administrative law.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Citizenship, Democracy, and the Transformation of Public Law

Thornhill¹

2020

Law and the Citizen

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This article proposes a sociological reconstruction of the emergence of citizenship as a source of legitimacy for political institutions, and it focuses on examining the historical processes that first gave rise to this concept. It explains how citizenship has its origins in the transformation of feudal law, a process that culminated in patterns of military organization that characterized the rise of the early modern state in Europe. On this basis, it describes how the growth of constitutional democracy was integrally marked by the militarization of society and explains that military pressures have remained palpable in constitutional constructions of citizenship. In particular, it argues that, through the early growth of democracy, national citizenship practices were closely linked to global conflicts, and they tended to replicate such conflicts in national contexts. It concludes by showing how more recent processes of constitutional norm formation, based largely in international human rights law, have acted to soften the military dimensions of citizenship.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Citizenship, Democracy, and the Transformation of Public Law

Thornhill¹

2020

Law and the Citizen

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…See, for example, Borgwardt (2005), Burgers (1992), Cohen (2012), Donnelly (2003, Emmerji, Jolly, and Weiss (2001), Humphrey (1970Humphrey ( , 1984, Hunt (2007), Ishay (2007), Korey (1998), Lauren (1983Lauren ( , 2003, and Weise and Thakur (2010).…”

Section: Fundingmentioning

confidence: 96%

Tehran 1968 and Reform of the UN Human Rights System

Thompson¹

2015

Journal of Human Rights

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…Hak ini merupakan hak yang langsung melekat pada manusia semenjak ia diciptakan, dan bahkan sejak ia masih berada dalam kandungan, dan tidak dapat dilepaskan maupun dihilangkan hak tersebut oleh siapapun (Arnhart 1998). Tanpa pengaturan mengenai HAM, manusia tidak dapat dijamin kemaslahatan hidupnya, dan tidak akan tercapai keadilan yang pasti di seluruh dunia, di mana tiap-tiap strata manusia diperlakukan secara sama dan setara (Lauren 1983).…”

Section: Perlindungan Hukum Ham Dan Konvensi-konvensi Internasional T...unclassified

Perlindungan Hak dalam Mendapatkan Pekerjaan yang Layak terhadap Mitra dari Perusahaan Jasa Transportasi Daring

Sinaga,

Rahmahafida

2023

Jurnal Hk.Mag.Op

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Abstract This research aims to analyze and study legal protection and human rights for partners of online transportation service companies using normative juridical methods with a conceptual approach and a statutory approach. The novelty of this research with previous research is thatthis research discusses the legal position of partners in online motorcycle taxi companies and legal and human rights protection for online motorcycle taxi partners. Therefore, it can seem from the nature of the cooperative relationship, Go-Jek's partners are unattached by the employment agreement regulated in Article 1 number 15 concerning Law No.13/2003 so there is no mechanism for systematic wage distribution. The existence of Law No.13/2003 protects many basic rights that are fundamental to workers' lives. However, Law No.13/2003 is still limited to workers whose considered official employees in a company, whose legal protection is still unclear in protecting human rights caused by other people so that people can relish all the rights granted by law. On the other hand, the state also should protect these rights legally and within the system set out in the United Nations Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights (UNGPs) and In theICESCR Convention in article 6 paragraph (2). Therefore, legislation is indeed a needed main problem in solving a case. The government can review Law No.13/2003 by widening the range of types of workers, nor clarifying the definitions and requirements of elements that canclassify workers into types the contracts. Keywords: human rights; legal protection; partner position; transportation service Abstrak Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis dan mengkaji perlindungan hukum dan hak asasi manusia terhadap mitra dari perusahaan jasa transportasi daring dengan menggunakan metode yuridis normatif dengan pendekatan konseptual dan pendekatan perundang-undangan. Kebaruan dari penelitian ini dengan penelitian terdahulu yakni penelitian ini membahas mengenai kedudukan hukum mitra pada perusahaan ojek daring serta perlindungan hukum dan HAM terhadap mitra ojek daring. Oleh karena itu, terlihat dari sifat hubungan kerjasamanya, para mitra Go-Jek tidak terikat dengan perjanjian kerja yang diatur dalam Pasal 1 angka 15 tentang UU No.13 Tahun 2003 sehingga tidak ada mekanisme pembagian upah yang sistematis. Keberadaan UU No.13/2003 melindungi banyak hak dasar yang mendasar bagi kehidupan pekerja. Namun, UU No.13/2003 masih terbatas pada pekerja yang dianggap pegawai resmi di suatu perusahaan, yang belum jelas perlindungan hukumnya dalam melindungi hak asasi manusia yang disebabkan oleh orang lain agar masyarakat dapat menikmati semua hak yang diberikan oleh undang-undang. Di sisi lain, negara juga memiliki kewajiban untuk melindungi hak-hak tersebut secara hukum dandalam sistem yang diatur dalam United Nations Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights (UNGPs) dan Pasal 6 ayat (2) ICESCR. Oleh karena itu, perundang-undangan memang menjadi masalah utama yang dibutuhkan dalam menyelesaikan suatu perkara. Pemerintah dapat mengkaji ulang UU No.13/2003dengan memperluas jenis pekerja, serta mengklarifikasi definisi dan persyaratan elemen yang dapat mengklasifikasikan pekerja ke dalamjenis kontrak yang ada. Kata kunci: hak asasi manusia; jasa transportasi; kedudukan mitra; perlindungan hukum

show abstract

First Principles of Racial Equality: History and the Politics and Diplomacy of Human Rights Provisions in the United Nations Charter

Cited by 27 publications

References 0 publications

Citizenship, Democracy, and the Transformation of Public Law

Citizenship, Democracy, and the Transformation of Public Law

Tehran 1968 and Reform of the UN Human Rights System

Perlindungan Hak dalam Mendapatkan Pekerjaan yang Layak terhadap Mitra dari Perusahaan Jasa Transportasi Daring

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About