2012 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium 2012
DOI: 10.1109/igarss.2012.6350733
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

First principles modeling for lidar sensing of complex ice surfaces

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The ICESat‐2 follow‐on mission will utilize a photon‐counting approach to potentially characterize individual crevasses in addition to crevasse fields [ Abdalati et al ., ]. Simulations and empirical data collected by the Multiple Altimeter Beam Experimental Lidar (MABEL) over the Greenland Ice Sheet have already demonstrated the ability of photon‐counting altimetry to map crevassed surface features at submeter resolutions [ Kerekes et al ., ].…”
Section: Remotely Sensed Observationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ICESat‐2 follow‐on mission will utilize a photon‐counting approach to potentially characterize individual crevasses in addition to crevasse fields [ Abdalati et al ., ]. Simulations and empirical data collected by the Multiple Altimeter Beam Experimental Lidar (MABEL) over the Greenland Ice Sheet have already demonstrated the ability of photon‐counting altimetry to map crevassed surface features at submeter resolutions [ Kerekes et al ., ].…”
Section: Remotely Sensed Observationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given the expected number of noise and signal photons in the neighborhood, the parameter MinPts can be expressed as equation (10).…”
Section: 𝐹𝑊𝐻𝑀 = 2√𝑙𝑛2𝜎mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The PCL is becoming increasingly popular because it can provide massive data and detect objects invisible to traditional remote sensing technologies. However, since this mechanism of PCL is sensitive to individual photon, it can not only receive signal echoes reflected from the ground surface but also record noise echoes returned by scattering and reflection, thus its data can severely be affected by the ambient condition (atmospheric scattering and solar radiation), target feature (land-cover types and reflectance), and instrument performance (transmit energy, detector efficiency, and deadtime and after-pulsing effect) [9] [10]. As a result, there are usually numerous noise photon events randomly and widely L 2 > REPLACE THIS LINE WITH YOUR MANUSCRIPT ID NUMBER (DOUBLE-CLICK HERE TO EDIT) < distributed along the laser propagation path, especially in the daytime data.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The second factor, namely the type of surface, is less obvious. The optical properties of ice and snow are affected by many variables, including density, salinity, dissolved components, particle size, and surface cover [9,10]. Differential penetration by the laser into diverse surfaces, such as ice, snow, melting or slushy snow, water, solid rock, require different threshold values.…”
Section: Determination Of Noise Reduction Parametersmentioning
confidence: 99%