2013
DOI: 10.3390/e16010287
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

First Principles Methods: A Perspective from Quantum Monte Carlo

Abstract: Quantum Monte Carlo methods are among the most accurate algorithms for predicting properties of general quantum systems. We briefly introduce ground state, path integral at finite temperature and coupled electron-ion Monte Carlo methods, their merits and limitations. We then discuss recent calculations using these methods for dense liquid hydrogen as it undergoes a molecular/atomic (metal/insulator) transition. We then discuss a procedure that can be used to assess electronic density functionals, which in turn… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
38
0
3

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 122 publications
0
38
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…In fact, all known exact algorithms for classical computers scale exponentially except for a small class of model systems [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9]. In particular, Quantum Monte Carlo (QMC) methods [10][11][12][13], which are able to provide the exact bosonic ground state in polynomial time for a wide range of Hamiltonians, suffer from a sign problem when applied to fermions. In the following we will often refer to the solution of the fermion sign problem, implicitly meaning that the exact fermion ground state is obtained in polynomial time rather than in exponential time with respect to the number of particles.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fact, all known exact algorithms for classical computers scale exponentially except for a small class of model systems [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9]. In particular, Quantum Monte Carlo (QMC) methods [10][11][12][13], which are able to provide the exact bosonic ground state in polynomial time for a wide range of Hamiltonians, suffer from a sign problem when applied to fermions. In the following we will often refer to the solution of the fermion sign problem, implicitly meaning that the exact fermion ground state is obtained in polynomial time rather than in exponential time with respect to the number of particles.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…with an obvious correspondence between Equations (1) and (2). The Hamiltonian does not depend on the spin of electrons and nuclei, since we restrict ourselves to the non-relativistic limit, and we do not include any spin-orbit interaction into our Hamiltonian.…”
Section: The Potential Energy Surface (Pes) Of a Many-atom Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most ab initio methods, such as those discussed in [2], represent systems as made of electrons and atomic nuclei, and Coulomb's law is sufficient to account for every interaction. In all other cases, particles represent composite objects, such as atoms or atomic nuclei, dressed by core electrons, possibly embedded into a sea of valence electrons described at some approximate level of a many-body theory.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast to quantumchemical methods, where the computational complexity grows rapidly with the number of considered electrons N [7], the formal scaling of quantum Monte Carlo (QMC) methods is similar to those of HF and DFT [8][9][10][11][12]. However, since it typically relies on HF or DFT orbitals to construct the Slater determinant (SD), it only allows to extract the vast majority of dynamic electron correlation, but suffers from exactly the same static correlation error that is characteristic for single-reference electronic structure methods [13].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%