“…In the literature, many ab initio calculations have been conducted to explore dimers of various endohedrally doped cage clusters, including [Si@Al 12 ] 2 , [B@Al 12 ][P@Al 12 ], [Al@Al 12 –P@Al 12 ], [Zr@Si 16 ] 2 , [Ti@Ge 16 ] 2 , [Ta@Si 16 F] 2 , [W@Si 12 ] 2 , [Cr@Si 12 ] 2 , [Ti@Si 16 ] 2 , , [Sc@Si 16 K] 2 and [V@Si 16 F] 2 , [Sc@Si 16 –V@Si 16 ], [Ta@Si 16 ] 2 , [V 2 Si 20 ] 2 , [Mn@Sn 12 ] 2 , , [MPb 10 ] 2 (M = Fe, Co, Ni), [Ti@Au 14 ] 2 , [Mo@Au 12 ] 2 , [W@Au 12 ] 2 , [M@Cd n S n ] 2 (M = Y, Zr, Nb, Mo, Tc, Ru, Rh, Rh, Pd, Ag, Cd; n = 12, 16), and [A@X 12 @A 20 ] 2 (A = Sn, Pb; X = Mg, Zn, Cd, Mn) . However, it turns out that most of the aforementioned doped clusters with cage-like structures and closed electronic shells, such as Si@Al 12 , W@Si 12 , Zr@Si 16 , Ti@Au 14 , Mo@Au 12 , and W@Au 12 , still interact strongly with each other by forming chemical bonds (with intercluster binding energy larger than 1 eV). ,,,, Consequently, the structural identity and unique electronic properties of each of these clusters cannot be well retained in the cluster dimers.…”