First principles in Aristotle's <i>Parts of Animals</i>

Gotthelf, Allan

doi:10.1017/cbo9780511552564.011

Cited by 30 publications

(8 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Aristotle divided non‐uniform parts into external and internal organs (Gotthelf, ; Lennox, ). His external organs, e.g., face, ear, and hand, are often now simply called “body parts.” These externally detectable body parts were listed in the Basle Nomina Anatomica (His, ), and in all subsequent revisions, under Partes corporis humani , whereas the internal organs, e.g., heart, liver, and brain, were grouped in organ systems.…”

Section: Internal (Or Visceral) and Other Glandular Organsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Organ or not? prolegomenon to organology

Neumann

2017

Clinical Anatomy

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The definition of an organ is vague, so that listing and classifying human organs is problematic. The classical Greek definition of an organ as an instrumental part of the body has been supplemented in modern biology by stating that organs occupy a hierarchical level between systems and tissues. Not all anatomical entities on that level meet the requirement of a special function. Thus it appears that systems are composed of organs and connecting (or linking) structures, such as some connective tissues, various tubular entities, and nerves. Clin. Anat. 30:288-289, 2017. © 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

show abstract

Section: Internal (Or Visceral) and Other Glandular Organsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Aristotle divided non-uniform parts into external and internal organs (Gotthelf, 1987;Lennox, 1987). His external organs, e.g., face, ear, and hand, are often now simply called "body parts."…”

Section: Abstract: Organ; Anatomical Terminology; Anatomical Ontologymentioning

confidence: 99%

Organ or not? prolegomenon to organology

Neumann

2017

Clinical Anatomy

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…674a9-b17 referred to by Gotthelf (1987). Gotthelf claims (1987, 186) that such passages can be fitted into a linear axiomatic structure, which seems a bit exaggerated.…”

Section: Theories Of Argumentationmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…For the discussion, see alsoBarnes (1969 and,Wians (1989 and,Bolton (1987),Gotthelf (1987),Lennox (1987) andLeszl (1981).…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Apprehension and Argument

Tuominen

2007

Studies in the History of Philosophy of Mind

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Aims and ScopeThe aim of the series is to foster historical research into the nature of thinking and the workings of the mind. The volumes address topics of intellectual history that would nowadays fall into different disciplines like philosophy of mind, philosophical psychology, artificial intelligence, cognitive science, etc. The monographs and collections of articles in the series are historically reliable as well as congenial to the contemporary reader. They provide original insights into central contemporary problems by looking at them in historical contexts, addressing issues like consciousness, representation and intentionality, mind and body, the self and the emotions. In this way, the books open up new perspectives for research on these topics. (HB) ISBN 13: 978-1-4020-5042-8 (HB) ISBN 10: 1-4020-5043-7 (e-book) ISBN 13: 978-1-4020-5043-5 (e-book)Published by Springer,

show abstract

“…Sin embargo, con el desarrollo más reciente de una visión heterodoxa originada en investigaciones sobre las obras de biología, tal interpretación comenzó a ser revisada. Una nueva serie de trabajos desarrollados por Lennox (1987Lennox ( y 2001, Gotthelf (1987Gotthelf ( y 1997, Devereux y Pellegrin (1990), más el aporte de Detel (1997Detel ( y 2006) en relación con la biología pero también su traducción con un exhaustivo comentario de los Analíticos (1993), han venido a poner en crisis la tesis de la discrepancia 1 . Por último, en el ámbito latinoamericano, distintos investigadores vienen transitando un camino semejante: la compilación de L. Angioni (2014a) y los artículos allí incluidos, más los trabajos de F. Mié (2010Mié ( , 2013aMié ( y 2013b tienen como meta revisar numerosos aspectos relativos a la interpretación de la filosofía de la ciencia aristotélica y, entre estos, también el problema de la tesis de la discrepancia.…”

Section: Introductionunclassified

Demonstration by Efficient Cause on Aristotle’s De generatione et corruptione 2. 10

Berrón

2016

Circe

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Abstract:We take as an object of study the text De generatione et corruptione (GC) 2. 10 to establish the use of scientific demonstration. Aristotle states in GC 1 the principles of generation but then he builds genuine scientific demonstrations basing precisely on those principles. We will reconstruct a specific passage of GC 2. 10 in order to defend the hypothesis of the real use of scientific demonstration in scientific treatises. Particularly, in the frame of the four Aristotelian causes, we show that this demonstration makes explicit the efficient cause of the phainomena of generation and corruption.

show abstract

First principles in Aristotle's Parts of Animals

Cited by 30 publications

References 0 publications

Organ or not? prolegomenon to organology

Organ or not? prolegomenon to organology

Apprehension and Argument

Demonstration by Efficient Cause on Aristotle’s De generatione et corruptione 2. 10

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About