2005
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.707124
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

First Principles for an Effective Rewrite of the Telecommunications Act of 1996

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 9 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As emphasized in section 2, there is an optimal level of regulatory independence that varies across sectors and over time and that depends on the institutional endowment of each country or jurisdiction. For example, Geradin and Sidak (2003) describe the different approaches between the US [10] and the EU in the institutional design of telecommunications. [11] In both jurisdictions a key issue is the interaction between regulation and antitrust in designing how competition in some segments of the value chain must take place in the context of monopolist bottlenecks, an issue that is discussed in depth in Farrell and Weiser (2003).…”
Section: Governance and Independence In Telecommunicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As emphasized in section 2, there is an optimal level of regulatory independence that varies across sectors and over time and that depends on the institutional endowment of each country or jurisdiction. For example, Geradin and Sidak (2003) describe the different approaches between the US [10] and the EU in the institutional design of telecommunications. [11] In both jurisdictions a key issue is the interaction between regulation and antitrust in designing how competition in some segments of the value chain must take place in the context of monopolist bottlenecks, an issue that is discussed in depth in Farrell and Weiser (2003).…”
Section: Governance and Independence In Telecommunicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%