1981
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.24.3393
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

First-principles electronic structure of Si, Ge, GaP, GaAs, ZnS, and ZnSe. I. Self-consistent energy bands, charge densities, and effective masses

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

11
72
1

Year Published

1986
1986
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 334 publications
(84 citation statements)
references
References 92 publications
11
72
1
Order By: Relevance
“…1, 1.547. At the bond midpoint, the present charge density peaks at 0.61 e,~ -3 and shows close agreement with previously reported experimental and theoretical maps (Wang & Klein, 1981;Yin & Cohen, 1983;Spackman, 1986), except for details such as the twin peak feature reported in the static valence density maps. Although the maximum of --,0.77e,~ -3 in the previous density represents a different value, the base part of the bond charge appears to be identical to that of the new density as seen in Fig.…”
Section: The Value Of the Forbidden F(222)supporting
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…1, 1.547. At the bond midpoint, the present charge density peaks at 0.61 e,~ -3 and shows close agreement with previously reported experimental and theoretical maps (Wang & Klein, 1981;Yin & Cohen, 1983;Spackman, 1986), except for details such as the twin peak feature reported in the static valence density maps. Although the maximum of --,0.77e,~ -3 in the previous density represents a different value, the base part of the bond charge appears to be identical to that of the new density as seen in Fig.…”
Section: The Value Of the Forbidden F(222)supporting
confidence: 91%
“…Furthermore, the sharp maximum at the bond midpoint has been argued to be inconsistent with previous theoretical (e.g. Wang & Klein, 1981;Yin & Cohen, 1983) and experimental (Spackman, 1986) valence densities. In contrast, the MEM density of Be based on single-crystal data (Larsen & Hansen, 1984) is quite smooth and such fine features do not appear (Takata, Sakata, Kumazawa, Larsen & Iversen, 1994;Iversen, Larsen, Souhassou & Takata, 1995).…”
Section: The Mem Charge Density Of Si Obtained Previouslymentioning
confidence: 76%
“…The map of Pwl reported by Wang & Klein (1981) compares favourably with the results in Fig. 5, having rectangular bond contours, with a plateau level of ---0.58cA -3, and a peak behind the nuclei of ---0.38 e A -3.…”
Section: (I) Deformation Densitysupporting
confidence: 69%
“…Only one theoretical calculation of Ap(r) in bulk Si is known to us, that by Wang & Klein (1981). The bond peak obtained in that work is only --0.16 e/~-3, with a deficit behind the nucleus of --0.08 e A -s. The bond peak compares poorly with both the model and Fourier results obtained above.…”
Section: (I) Deformation Densitymentioning
confidence: 94%
“…One of the few theoretical calculations of zip(r) that has been published is by Wang & Klein (1981). They found a maximum in zip of 0.16 e A -3 using a linear combination of Gaussian orbitals (LCGO) method, a value which is smaller than the present one and than the experimental values.…”
Section: Deformation Densitycontrasting
confidence: 53%