2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.actamat.2010.06.045
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

First-principles data for solid-solution strengthening of magnesium: From geometry and chemistry to properties

Abstract: Solid-solution strengthening results from solutes impeding the glide of dislocations. Existing theories of strength rely on solutedislocation interactions, but do not consider dislocation core structures, which need an accurate treatment of chemical bonding. Here, we focus on strengthening of Mg, the lightest of all structural metals and a promising replacement for heavier steel and aluminum alloys. Elasticity theory, which is commonly used to predict the requisite solute-dislocation interaction energetics, is… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

6
116
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 332 publications
(123 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
6
116
1
Order By: Relevance
“…For purposes of guiding alloy design, i.e. selection of solutes, Trinkle et al [39] devised two quantitative measures for the solute/dislocation interaction energy, a misfit volume parameter and a solute/stacking fault interaction parameter, and used these parameters in Fleischer/Friedel-type model to predict trends in solute strengthening at 0 K. Quantitatively predictive models have remained elusive. The long-range issue was only clearly addressed by the new theory presented in the following sections.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For purposes of guiding alloy design, i.e. selection of solutes, Trinkle et al [39] devised two quantitative measures for the solute/dislocation interaction energy, a misfit volume parameter and a solute/stacking fault interaction parameter, and used these parameters in Fleischer/Friedel-type model to predict trends in solute strengthening at 0 K. Quantitatively predictive models have remained elusive. The long-range issue was only clearly addressed by the new theory presented in the following sections.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…10 The dislocation core-where the continuum description of the strain fields breaks down-provides the largest distortions in geometry and the attraction of solutes to this region is crucial for solute effects on strength. [11][12][13] Tensile strain also lowers the vibrational excitation for H, and, in a dislocation core, broken symmetry splits the excitations. 14 The vibration of Pd next to H changes the local potential energy for each H atom, broadening the vibrational excitations.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The additional contribution to SSH can be attributed to the low SFE of Co. As mentioned in Section IV-A, the slip misfit e s [28] can be considered as an added contribution to e. Assuming a linear variation in SFE for the sake of argument, e s can be written as Dc c ; here, Dc is the difference between SFEs of FCC Ni (120 to 130 mJ/m 2 [37] ) and FCC Co (~10 mJ/m 2 [38] ), and c is the SFE of the solvent. Thus, it can be seen that e s could provide a significant contribution to k for Co (due to the low value of c), suggesting a possible explanation for the difference between the k values of Co and Ni alloys containing the same solute.…”
Section: Co-based Binary Alloysmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…A probable explanation for this difference then is the contribution of chemical or slip misfit effect to SSH. This effect has been incorporated [28] [29] the slip misfit parameter can be expected to contribute to the high value of k.…”
Section: A Fe-co and Fe-ni Binary Alloysmentioning
confidence: 99%