2015
DOI: 10.1007/s10876-015-0956-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

First-Principles Calculations of Magnetism in Nanoscale Carbon Materials Confining Metal with f Valence Electrons

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 99 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The 3D nanocage structures [An@Au 14 ] n (where An = Ac, Th, Pa or U; n = −1, 0 or +1, respectively), all satisfy the 18electron configuration of 1S 2 1P 6 1D 10 jellium state that is analogous to the previously reported electronic structures such as W@Au 12 , [19] wherein the bonding involves primarily interactions between the s-and d-type shells of the endohedral atom and those of the gold-cage superatom (Au 6s orbitals). However, for the magnetic clusters (Pa@Au 14 and U@Au 14 ), these 5f-electron MOs maintain their original atomic orbital characteristics, and exhibit characteristics similar to those of the endohedral metallofullerenes (EMFs) [92][93][94] or passivated quantum dots. [95][96][97][98][99][100] The 2D planar structures, An@Au 7 (An = La or Ac), each represent a closed-shell electronic structure with a 1S 2 1P 4 1D 4 jellium model state, which is similar to previously reported structures, such as Ti@Au 6 , Sc@Cu 7 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The 3D nanocage structures [An@Au 14 ] n (where An = Ac, Th, Pa or U; n = −1, 0 or +1, respectively), all satisfy the 18electron configuration of 1S 2 1P 6 1D 10 jellium state that is analogous to the previously reported electronic structures such as W@Au 12 , [19] wherein the bonding involves primarily interactions between the s-and d-type shells of the endohedral atom and those of the gold-cage superatom (Au 6s orbitals). However, for the magnetic clusters (Pa@Au 14 and U@Au 14 ), these 5f-electron MOs maintain their original atomic orbital characteristics, and exhibit characteristics similar to those of the endohedral metallofullerenes (EMFs) [92][93][94] or passivated quantum dots. [95][96][97][98][99][100] The 2D planar structures, An@Au 7 (An = La or Ac), each represent a closed-shell electronic structure with a 1S 2 1P 4 1D 4 jellium model state, which is similar to previously reported structures, such as Ti@Au 6 , Sc@Cu 7 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…33 Rather recent work investigated actinides in gold clusters 34 and versatile uranium−carbon nanostructure complexes. 35 So far, the only experimentally characterized (besides MS spectrum) actinide EMFs are U@C 82 and Th@C 84 , studied by Akiyama et al 8,11−13 For both the UV−vis/NIR and XANES, spectra were recorded. The XANES and electronic absorption spectra pointed out clearly that U@C 82 is U@C 82 -C 2v (9) system with uranium atom in oxidation state III.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An@C 28 , An@C 26 , and An@C 40 series , as well as U@C 36 , Pu@C 24 , and U@C 82 have been studied theoretically. Actinide–actinide bonding was noted by Wu and Lu in the U 2 @C 60 system in 2007, and several studies followed. We have theoretically characterized the U 2 @C 80 molecule as a 7 U 2 @C 80 - I h (7) system where six unpaired U­(5f) electrons form a double ferromagnetic bond between the enclosed uranium atoms . Rather recent work investigated actinides in gold clusters and versatile uranium–carbon nanostructure complexes …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Experimental studies have shown that these adsorbed defects have magnetic moments which arise from the spin polarization of adatomic electrons . Several previous studies using conventional density functional theory (DFT) have also confirmed this theoretical model …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 63%
“…[5] Several previous studies using conventional density functional theory (DFT) have also confirmed this theoretical model. [6][7][8][9] Compared to first-principles, in particular DFT, the self-consistent charge density functional tight-binding method (SCC-DFTB, hereafter abbreviated as DFTB) provides a new extension and analysis platform for quantum calculations [10] and is aimed at giving a good approximation for DFT results. In DFTB, only the two-center integral Hamiltonian and overlap matrix elements are included, with the three-center integral neglected and a short-range repulsive potential used.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%