2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.ccr.2008.05.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

First principles calculation of Mössbauer isomer shift

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
84
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 67 publications
(86 citation statements)
references
References 145 publications
1
84
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This issue has been widely discussed for isomer shifts and it seems to be a common conclusion that functionals with a high amount of exact exchange are to be preferred. 10,20 Yet, using the X2C Hamiltonian and for the molecules investigated here, we find the the PBE functional performs well and is not inferior to the hybrid version PBE0 -the latter having a high amount of exact exchange (25%). Although our present CCSD results indicate that PBE0 is more accurate, a test with a larger and more varied test set should be performed before reaching a final conclusion regarding the best suited DFT functional for the X2C Hamiltonian.…”
Section: Comparison To Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…This issue has been widely discussed for isomer shifts and it seems to be a common conclusion that functionals with a high amount of exact exchange are to be preferred. 10,20 Yet, using the X2C Hamiltonian and for the molecules investigated here, we find the the PBE functional performs well and is not inferior to the hybrid version PBE0 -the latter having a high amount of exact exchange (25%). Although our present CCSD results indicate that PBE0 is more accurate, a test with a larger and more varied test set should be performed before reaching a final conclusion regarding the best suited DFT functional for the X2C Hamiltonian.…”
Section: Comparison To Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…and is a function of the nuclear radius R. Following Filatov [19,22], we calculate the associated shift in frequency of the emitted or absorbed photon as an energy derivative …”
Section: Validity Of the Contact Density Approximationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is hardly a viable approach in a relativistic framework due to the weak singularity of the electron density at the nucleus. We therefore follow the approach of Filatov [19,22] in which the isomer shift is calculated as an energy derivative. We start with the clamped-nucleus approximation in which a nucleus provides an electrostatic potential that depends on the nuclear charge density q n as / n ðr e ; RÞ ¼ Z d 3 r n q n ðr n ; RÞ r ne ;…”
Section: Validity Of the Contact Density Approximationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, it should be noted that this calculation includes some limitations as pointed out by Filatov and coworkers. [31] This is because Equation (2) derived by non-relativistic treatment is employed and the finite nucleus effect is not considered for ρ0 values obtained by the present ZORA-DFT calculation.…”
Section: Correlation Between ρ0 Calc and δNp Expmentioning
confidence: 99%