2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2007.11.095
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

First principles calculation of elastic and lattice constants of orthorhombic Cu3Sn crystal

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
10
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
(33 reference statements)
2
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…2. For Cu 3 Sn, the values are similar to those of [59] and there is a large difference with the other calculated values from literature, even though An et al [58] have used the same structure as that used in this work. Since there are no experimentally measured values for the stiffness of Cu 3 Sn, we cannot comment further on the accuracy of the calculated values.…”
Section: Simulated Casessupporting
confidence: 75%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…2. For Cu 3 Sn, the values are similar to those of [59] and there is a large difference with the other calculated values from literature, even though An et al [58] have used the same structure as that used in this work. Since there are no experimentally measured values for the stiffness of Cu 3 Sn, we cannot comment further on the accuracy of the calculated values.…”
Section: Simulated Casessupporting
confidence: 75%
“…There are some measurements of Young's modulus using compression tests [56] and micro-and nano-indentation [49], but since none of these phases is isotropic, we need measurements of the full stiffness tensor. Ab initio calculations have been performed [57,58,59,60,61] for Cu 3 Sn and Cu 6 Sn 5 , however there is a large spread on the reported data and it is difficult to conclude on which values are most accurate. Therefore, we have performed extra ab initio calculations for the 4 phases, with convergence criteria that are more severe than in any of the previous studies, to guide our selection of appropriate stiffness coefficients for the phase-field simulations.…”
Section: Ab Initio Calculation Of Stiffness Tensorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The calculated polycrystalline Young's modulus is further compared with the published data obtained from nanoindentation testing [12,14], whereas the calculated polycrystalline Poisson's ratio is compared with those measured by the microindentation technique [11] and the pulse-echo technique [13]. Besides, these polycrystalline Young's moduli are also compared with the published theoretical data using first-principles calculations [16,19]. The comparisons are made in Figs.…”
Section: Polycrystalline Elastic Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, Chen et al [16] performed density functional theory (DFT) calculations within the generalized-gradient approximation (GGA) [17] using the Vienna Ab-initio Simulation Package (VASP) [18] to assess the elastic properties of Cu 3 Sn monocrystal. Pang et al [19] carried out first-principles calculations based on the plane wave pseudo-potential method of DFT, combining with GGA, as implemented in the DACAPO™ package [20] to investigate the elastic properties of single crystal Cu 3 Sn. Unfortunately, first-principles calculations are restricted to picoseconds and relatively small system (a few hundred atoms) because of limited computer capacities such as computer speed and memory.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The lattice constants of Cu 3 Sn were also calculated and are presented in Table I; the results of the calculation are 2% larger than the experimental data. [19][20][21] The bulk modulus of Cu 3 Sn was calculated to be 1.087 Mbar, which is approximately 4.6% lower than the experimental data of 1.138 Mbar. 22 Overall, our calculated results for both Cu and Cu 3 Sn are in good agreement with experimental data, which is a prerequisite for applying the methodology and the bulk properties to study the interfacial segregations.…”
Section: Computational Detailsmentioning
confidence: 62%