First principle analyses of direct bandgap solar cells with absorbing substrates versus mirrors

Abstract

Direct bandgap InP, GaAs, CdTe, and Ga 0.5 In 0.5 P solar cells containing backside mirrors as well as parasitically absorbing substrates are analyzed for their limiting open circuit voltage and power conversion efficiency with comparison to record solar cells. From the principle of detailed balance, it is shown quantitatively that mirror solar cells have greater voltage and power conversion efficiency than their substrate counterparts. Next, the radiative recombination coefficient and maximum radiative lifetime of GaAs mirror and substrate solar cells are calculated and compared to the nonradiative Auger and Shockley-Read-Hall (SRH) lifetimes. Mirror solar cells have greater radiative lifetime than their substrate variants. Auger lifetime exceeds radiative lifetime for both substrate and mirror cells while SRH lifetime may be less or greater than radiative lifetime depending on trap concentration and capture cross section. Finally, the change in free energy of the photogenerated carriers is analyzed in a comparison between InP, GaAs, CdTe, and Ga 0.5 In 0.5 P mirror and substrate solar cells in order to characterize the relationship between solar photon quality and free energy management in solar cells with differing bandgaps. Wider bandgap visible threshold Ga 0.5 In 0.5 P solar cells make better use of the available change in free energy of the photogenerated charge carriers, even when normalized to the bandgap energy, than narrower bandgap near-IR threshold InP, GaAs, and CdTe solar cells. V C 2013 AIP Publishing LLC.

Middle Cell Development for Wafer-Bonded III-V//Si Tandem Solar Cells

“…(3) could then be calculated [22] in the radiative limit on a substrate for a photon current j ph given a solar spectrum as AM1.5g in our case. The refractive index needs to be taken at the wavelength of Fig.…”