Proceedings of the Twenty-Seventh International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence 2018
DOI: 10.24963/ijcai.2018/236
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

First-Order Rewritability of Frontier-Guarded Ontology-Mediated Queries

Abstract: We focus on ontology-mediated queries (OMQs) based on (frontier-)guarded existential rules and (unions of) conjunctive queries, and we investigate the problem of FO-rewritability, i.e., whether an OMQ can be rewritten as a first-order query. We adopt two different approaches. The first approach employs standard two-way alternating parity tree automata. Although it does not lead to a tight complexity bound, it provides a transparent solution based on widely known tools. The second approach relies on a sophistic… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This means that there is little hope for our dichotomy to be decidable over arbitrary Datalog queries, but on its own it does not imply undecidability, so the question remains open. However, our dichotomy is effective for query languages for which boundedness is decidable, e.g., monadic Datalog, its generalization GN-Datalog [BTCCB15], C2RPQs [BFR19], or ontology-mediated query answering with guarded existential rules [BBLP18].…”
Section: Results Statementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This means that there is little hope for our dichotomy to be decidable over arbitrary Datalog queries, but on its own it does not imply undecidability, so the question remains open. However, our dichotomy is effective for query languages for which boundedness is decidable, e.g., monadic Datalog, its generalization GN-Datalog [BTCCB15], C2RPQs [BFR19], or ontology-mediated query answering with guarded existential rules [BBLP18].…”
Section: Results Statementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(non-uniform approach) How complex is it to decide, given an arbitrary DL-Lite ✷ bool/horn OMAQ or OMPIQ, whether it is FO(<)-, FO(<, ≡)or FO(RPR)-rewritable? For atemporal OMQs with DL-ontologies, this non-uniform approach to OBDA has been actively developed since the mid 2010s (Bienvenu, ten Cate, Lutz, & Wolter, 2014;Bienvenu, Hansen, Lutz, & Wolter, 2016;Barceló, Berger, Lutz, & Pieris, 2018). In the temporal case, first steps have recently been made for LTL OMQs in (Ryzhikov, Savateev, & Zakharyaschev, 2021).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…That Theorem 7 does not hold for such CQs is demonstrated by 5 in Example 1 (cf. Claim 7.1 (3)), 6 in Example 4 (cf. Claim 7.1 (4)), and 7 , 8 below (cf.…”
Section: Monadic D-sirups With a Ditree Cqmentioning
confidence: 98%