2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmmm.2018.09.086
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

First-order reversal curve (FORC) diagrams of nanomagnets with cubic magnetocrystalline anisotropy: A numerical approach

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
19
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
3
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These studies examined the effect of grain size, and identified the transition size for stable single-domain (SD) to singlevortex (SV) behaviour (∼54 − 70 nm for equidimensional grains); at this threshold size the magnetic structure becomes non-uniform and the magnetic response changes markedly. Numerical simulations have been performed for hysteresis and first-order reversal curve (FORC) properties of non-interacting SD and SV greigite dispersions (Valdez-Grijalva et al, 2018a;Valdez-Grijalva and Muxworthy, 2019); however, the FORC properties of highly interacting greigite ensembles remain poorly understood. FORC diagrams are routinely used in environmental magnetism and palaeomagnetism to identify magnetic minerals (Roberts et al, 2014(Roberts et al, , 2018b.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These studies examined the effect of grain size, and identified the transition size for stable single-domain (SD) to singlevortex (SV) behaviour (∼54 − 70 nm for equidimensional grains); at this threshold size the magnetic structure becomes non-uniform and the magnetic response changes markedly. Numerical simulations have been performed for hysteresis and first-order reversal curve (FORC) properties of non-interacting SD and SV greigite dispersions (Valdez-Grijalva et al, 2018a;Valdez-Grijalva and Muxworthy, 2019); however, the FORC properties of highly interacting greigite ensembles remain poorly understood. FORC diagrams are routinely used in environmental magnetism and palaeomagnetism to identify magnetic minerals (Roberts et al, 2014(Roberts et al, , 2018b.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…and Muxworthy, 2019;Valdez-Grijalva et al, 2018a). Then, the spherical triangle is subdivided into roughly equal trianglular sub-units to obtain 85 triangular cells; this was found to accurately represent a random distribution over the whole sphere.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These diagrams are attractive since the FORC distribution is expected to provide detailed information of the interaction field and its effects in particle assemblies 1 and under some circumstances, they allow to reconstruct the intrinsic properties of fine particle systems 26 . In non-interacting particle assemblies, the FORC diagram shows a single narrow distribution, or ridge, along the axis and in this case, it represents the intrinsic coercive field distribution (CFD) 14 , 19 , 27 , 28 . However, in assemblies of interacting particles, the interaction field modifies the width of the CFD, hereafter referred to as , and leads to a second ridge along the axis, known as the interaction field distribution (IFD), whose width, , has been shown to vary with the strength of the interaction field 1 , 19 , 26 , 27 , 29 , 30 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The multiaxial magnetocrystalline anisotropy as a characteristic trait of 4C pyrrhotite (Koulialias, Charilaou, Schäublin, et al, ) could be a cause for the peculiar negative slope in the FORC diagram (cf. Valdez‐Grijalva & Muxworthy, ). Such slope was yielded from authigenic pyrrhotite phases in sedimentary gas hydrate‐bearing deposits (e.g., Horng, ; Kars & Kodama, ) and from a mechanically treated 4C pyrrhotite particle fraction of <5 μm (Wehland et al, ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%