2022
DOI: 10.1088/1361-6501/ac6661
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

First-order differential filtering spectrum division method and information fusion multi-scale network for fault diagnosis of bearings under different loads

Abstract: In recent years, data-driven intelligent diagnosis methods have been widely applied in the field of bearing fault diagnosis. However, these methods involve some expert experience and knowledge, and cannot accurately mine bearing fault characteristics under different loads. To solve this problem, this paper proposes a First-order differential filtering spectrum division method (FDFSD) and an information fusion multi-scale network (IFMSNet) to realize bearing fault diagnosis under different working conditions. F… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(1) Collect the vibration signals of rolling bearings through the data acquisition system; (2) Using equations ( 6) and (7) During this experiment, the vibration signals of the drive end bearing were gathered under four different loads: 0, 1, 2, and 3hp. Based on these collected data, four datasets were constructed: A, B, C, and D. Each dataset comprises four types: normal (NORMAL), ball failure (BF), inner race failure (IF), and outer race failure (OF).…”
Section: Methodological Processmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…(1) Collect the vibration signals of rolling bearings through the data acquisition system; (2) Using equations ( 6) and (7) During this experiment, the vibration signals of the drive end bearing were gathered under four different loads: 0, 1, 2, and 3hp. Based on these collected data, four datasets were constructed: A, B, C, and D. Each dataset comprises four types: normal (NORMAL), ball failure (BF), inner race failure (IF), and outer race failure (OF).…”
Section: Methodological Processmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Currently, the mainstream fault diagnosis methods mainly include three types [6]: model-based diagnostic methods, expert experience-based diagnostic methods, and data-driven diagnostic methods. Among them, diagnostic methods based on models and expert experience knowledge are limited in their application due to difficulties in establishing accurate mechanism analysis models and a lack of self-learning ability [7]. The data-driven diagnostic method requires high professional knowledge and experience, and requires a lot of manpower and time [8,9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Zhang et al [38] fused CNNs with domain adaptive algorithms to achieve fault classification under variable working conditions. Wang et al [39] adopted the multi-scale information fusion network to realize bearing fault diagnosis under different loads. Bai et al [40] adopted the multi-channel CNN to fuse multi-channel fault information and improve fault classification accuracy.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%