2015
DOI: 10.1159/000431182
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

First Nomogram Predicting the Probability of Lymph Node Involvement in Prostate Cancer Patients Undergoing Radioisotope Guided Sentinel Lymph Node Dissection

Abstract: Introduction: Existing nomograms predicting lymph node involvement (LNI) in prostate cancer (PCa) are based on conventional lymphadenectomy. The aim of the study was to develop the first nomogram for predicting LNI in PCa patients undergoing sentinel guided pelvic lymph node dissection (sPLND). Materials and Methods: Analysis was performed on 1,296 patients with PCa who underwent radioisotope guided sPLND and retropubic radical prostatectomy (2005-2010). Median prostate specific antigen (PSA): 7.4 ng/ml (IQR 5… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In 2015, we reported the first sPLND-based nomogram, including the preoperative PSA, clinical category, and the Gleason sum as predictors for LNI 24 . Until now, it was the only available nomogram predicting LNI in prostate cancer patients based on sPLND.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In 2015, we reported the first sPLND-based nomogram, including the preoperative PSA, clinical category, and the Gleason sum as predictors for LNI 24 . Until now, it was the only available nomogram predicting LNI in prostate cancer patients based on sPLND.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…99m technetium nanocolloid was transrectally injected 24 h before surgery into the prostate with ultrasound guidance 24 . Three injections were performed per prostate lobe.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Since the Gleason score is the most important prognostic parameter in patients with prostate cancer [4,8,9,10,11], the absence of the prognostic information delivered by the Gleason score makes it difficult to counsel patients on their mortality risk and on adjuvant treatment options. Furthermore, retrospective series may contain patients with neoadjuvant hormonal treatment in whom the validity of postoperatively assigned Gleason score may be of concern.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[5]. The biopsy Gleason score has also been included in models predicting organ-confined disease [6] as well as lymph node involvement [7], and it is associated with outcome even in patients with advanced disease receiving systemic treatment [8,9].Preoperative staging underestimates pathologic stage and prostate biopsies underestimate the Gleason score compared with prostatectomy specimens in up to 66% of patients, depending on PSA levels, biopsy Gleason score and clinical stage [10]. Apart from these variables, which have been incorporated in a validated predictive model to predict Gleason upgrading [11], a number of biomolecular markers were associated with Gleason upgrading [12,13].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%