“…In the present study, only heart tissue was tested for all the individuals and it is possible that specific parasite biotypes allocated in different organs escaped from our PCR analyses. Although false-negative results are a possible outcome from our analyses, previous studies have shown heart as an effective tissue for the PCR detection of the parasite in wildlife species (Dubey, 2010;Torres-Castro et al, 2016;Torres-Castro, Medina-Pinto et al, 2019;Torres-Castro, Muñoz-Dueñas, et al, 2019;Zamora-Vélez et al, 2020); moreover, our study spans a broad taxonomic and phylogenetic diversity within activities such as presence of large numbers of felids as pets (house cats) in cities, or to the higher resilience of biodiversity-rich ecosystems to the spread of infection diseases (Keesing et al, 2010;Ostfeld, 2009;Ostfeld & Keesing, 2000;Suzán et al, 2009), or an interaction of both. To better understand this, large-scale studies on the presence and prevalence of T. gondii in native mammal species must be developed following several considerations: (1) special emphasis should be done in evaluating the prevalence of the infection in native felids, as they allow for the sexual cycle of the parasite,…”