2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.ttbdis.2019.03.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

First molecular detection and characterization of tick-borne pathogens in water buffaloes in Bohol, Philippines

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

5
5
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
5
5
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In the present study, PCR amplification with the A. marginale species-specific primers showed that the majority of detected rickettsial organisms were A. marginale (74.87% of all rickettsial pathogens-positive samples), which was in agreement with previous reports from Thailand [ 11 ] and the Philippines [ 22 ]. However, it is important to note that only 37 of these ‘ A. marginale’ amplified sequences were confirmed for species designation (i.e.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the present study, PCR amplification with the A. marginale species-specific primers showed that the majority of detected rickettsial organisms were A. marginale (74.87% of all rickettsial pathogens-positive samples), which was in agreement with previous reports from Thailand [ 11 ] and the Philippines [ 22 ]. However, it is important to note that only 37 of these ‘ A. marginale’ amplified sequences were confirmed for species designation (i.e.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…This high prevalence of buffalo positive for infection with rickettsial organisms was similar to those observed previously in Cuba (52% [20]) and Mozambique (72.2% [21]), but was higher than those reported in the Philippines (29% [22]), Malaysia (21.8% [23]), India (18.33% [24]), South Africa (17.3% [25]), Pakistan (14.73% [17]), Columbia (13.1% [26]), and northeast Thailand (8% [11]). In this study, the highest anaplasmosis prevalence was found in Southern Thailand (Phatthalung), while the lowest was at Northeastern Thailand (Nong Bua Lamphu).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Furthermore, A. ovis (79.0%), A. bovis (24.7%), and A. phagocytophilum (28.4%) in Yecheng sheep in current study, while A. ovis (1.5%), A. marginale (5.7%), and A. centrale (2.7%) were identified in ticks from Pakistan, the country that Yecheng borders (25). Other border countries of XUAR also have reports about Anaplasma infection (A. bovis, A. centrale, A. phagocytophilum, and A. marginale) in ruminants or ticks including Russia (26), Philippines (27), and south India (28). Notably, A. capra, a newly discovered emerging zoonotic species of Anaplasma, was not identified in the current study, although it has been reported in both XUAR (only four positive samples) and Gansu of China (29,30).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 43%
“…Based on statistical analysis, A. marginale infection ( P =0.0001) was significantly higher in cattle, while hemoplasma infection ( P =0.011) was significantly higher in water buffaloes ( Table 1 ). Although both ruminants are natural hosts, clinical anaplasmosis affects cattle more frequently, while water buffaloes act as reservoir hosts [ 12 , 14 ]. On the other hand, there is little information on the susceptibility of water buffaloes to hemoplasma.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%