The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2018
DOI: 10.1002/chem.201803929
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

First Micelle‐Free Photoredox Catalytic Access to Hydrated Electrons for Syntheses and Remediations with a Visible LED or even Sunlight

Abstract: Hydrated electrons are super-reductants, yet can be generated with visible light when two photons are pooled, most efficiently through storing the energy of the first photon in a radical pair formed by the reduction of an excited catalyst by a sacrificial donor. All previous such systems for producing synthetically useable amounts of hydrated electrons with an LED in the visible range had to resort to compartmentalization by SDS micelles to curb the performance-limiting recombination of the pair. To overcome m… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
20
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…When HUr 2− is oxidized by the excited Ru II complex, it deprotonates and remains dianionic. Since the metal complex is also anionic in this case, Coulombic repulsion limits undesirable reverse electron transfer between the oxidized donor and the reduced photocatalyst, and consequently, the [Ru(dcob) 3 ] 4− /HUr 2− system enabled the micelle‐free production of synthetically useable amounts of hydrated electrons with an LED for the first time . Blue rather than green light was used to optimize the excitation process.…”
Section: The Next Level: Reductive Excited‐state Quenching Followed Bmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When HUr 2− is oxidized by the excited Ru II complex, it deprotonates and remains dianionic. Since the metal complex is also anionic in this case, Coulombic repulsion limits undesirable reverse electron transfer between the oxidized donor and the reduced photocatalyst, and consequently, the [Ru(dcob) 3 ] 4− /HUr 2− system enabled the micelle‐free production of synthetically useable amounts of hydrated electrons with an LED for the first time . Blue rather than green light was used to optimize the excitation process.…”
Section: The Next Level: Reductive Excited‐state Quenching Followed Bmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Wenn HUr 2− durch den angeregten Ru II ‐Komplex oxidiert wird, gibt es ein Proton ab und bleibt dadurch dianionisch. Die starke Coulomb‐Abstoßung schränkt den Rückelektronentransfer zwischen oxidiertem Donor und reduziertem Photokatalysator (beide anionisch) stark ein, wodurch das [Ru(dcob) 3 ] 4− /HUr 2− ‐System erstmals die mizellfreie Erzeugung syntheserelevanter e aq .− ‐Mengen mit einer LED ermöglicht . Um die Anregung zu optimieren, wurde blaues (statt grünes) Licht verwendet.…”
Section: Die Nächste Ebene: Reduktives Löschen Angeregter Zustände Gunclassified
“…However,i np hotochemistry one excited state quenched via photoinduced electront ransfer (PET) does not necessarily mean that one reduced or oxidized species is formed. Despite practically quantitative excited-state quenching, the actual yield of free radicals or radicali ons might be close to zero, [20,21] but the determinationo fc age-escape efficiencies h for ag iven PET event requires more sophisticated experimental techniques such as quantitative transienta bsorption spectroscopy.O wing to the lack of systematic quantitative studies in photochemistry,t he exact factorst hat govern the overall efficiencies of PET processes are stillp oorly understood and areliable predictiono fthe h values cannot be made in advance.F or instance, the inherent photoreduction efficiencies for an anionic ruthenium(II) complex by as eries of dianionic electron donors differ by as much as af actor of 30. [20] Most h values for PET reactions with triplet-excited Ru complexes are in the range from 0.05 (5 %) to 0.6 (60 %), [21][22][23][24][25][26][27] clearlyi ndicating that unproductive in-cage recombination is ag eneral energywasting problem.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%