2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.fas.2014.10.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

First metatarsophalangeal joint arthrodesis – Do joint configuration and preparation technique matter?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
11
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
1
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Ellington et al 29 reported union rate was 87.9%, although it increased up to 93.1% when excluding patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Similarly, the consolidation of Korim and Allen 30 was 91.8% and Mahadevan et al 31 noted 91.2%. Chraim et al 32 obtained fusion rates of 93% with a DFA of 21°.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…Ellington et al 29 reported union rate was 87.9%, although it increased up to 93.1% when excluding patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Similarly, the consolidation of Korim and Allen 30 was 91.8% and Mahadevan et al 31 noted 91.2%. Chraim et al 32 obtained fusion rates of 93% with a DFA of 21°.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…There are two different techniques for joint preparation (ball and socket or flat surfaces) and numerous fixation options using plates, screws, wires, or staples. An important component for achieving walking biomechanical conditions is fusion of the joint with a slight valgus (up to 15°) and minimal dorsal flexion (20°-25°) [41,42].…”
Section: First Metatarsophalangeal Joint Arthrodesismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…42,43,45 Mahadevan et al investigated the influence of joint preparation and fixation technique. 41 They compared flat-on-flat versus ball-on-socket arthrodesis using fixation with either crossed compression screws or a combined dorsal plate and oblique compression screw. Joint surface preparation and fixation did not statistically influence the outcome in first MTP joint arthrodesis, but there was a trend towards higher union rates with low velocity bone surface preparation.…”
Section: Operative Treatmentmentioning
confidence: 99%