2020
DOI: 10.1136/gutjnl-2020-322339
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

First-line treatment with infliximab versus conventional treatment in children with newly diagnosed moderate-to-severe Crohn’s disease: an open-label multicentre randomised controlled trial

Abstract: ObjectiveIn newly diagnosed paediatric patients with moderate-to-severe Crohn’s disease (CD), infliximab (IFX) is initiated once exclusive enteral nutrition (EEN), corticosteroid and immunomodulator therapies have failed. We aimed to investigate whether starting first-line IFX (FL-IFX) is more effective to achieve and maintain remission than conventional treatment.DesignIn this multicentre open-label randomised controlled trial, untreated patients with a new diagnosis of CD (3–17 years old, weighted Paediatric… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

5
68
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 81 publications
(79 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
5
68
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…starting with the most potent treatment first) with step-up (starting with milder treatments) therapeutic approaches are insufficient to fully support this assumption. Whilst top-down approaches have been shown improved short-term prognosis possibly related to the more aggressive immunosuppression resulting in faster control of the inflammation [ 18 ], long-term outcome does not appear to be superior compared to a step-up approach [ 19 ]. Taken together, there is insufficient evidence in support of any currently available medical treatment being capable of altering (i.e.…”
Section: Existing Biomarkers In Ibdmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…starting with the most potent treatment first) with step-up (starting with milder treatments) therapeutic approaches are insufficient to fully support this assumption. Whilst top-down approaches have been shown improved short-term prognosis possibly related to the more aggressive immunosuppression resulting in faster control of the inflammation [ 18 ], long-term outcome does not appear to be superior compared to a step-up approach [ 19 ]. Taken together, there is insufficient evidence in support of any currently available medical treatment being capable of altering (i.e.…”
Section: Existing Biomarkers In Ibdmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While pediatric data on specific calprotectin cutoff levels and relapse risk post step-down are sparse, a level below the 100 mcg/g associated with “deep healing” in this population would be in keeping with the evidence around improved outcomes post withdrawal in the context of presumed mucosal healing ( 57 ). Pragmatically, pediatric patients with more severe disease—especially those diagnosed at a younger age that have extensive disease, growth failure, fistulizing or perianal phenotypes, steroid refractoriness, and previous surgical resection in CD—will benefit most from early combination therapy and subsequent delayed withdrawal ( 1 , 7 ). Predictors of severity of outcomes in PIBD have recently been more clearly delineated ( 58 , 59 ).…”
Section: Deciding Who and When To Withdraw—assessing Relapse Riskmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given recent advances in the management of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), a higher proportion of patients are being exposed to both biological and immunomodulator therapies earlier in their treatment course and for longer periods of time. First-line anti-tumor necrosis factor alpha (anti-TNF) treatment with infliximab (IFX) (so-called “top-down” strategy) for children with moderate-to-severe Crohn's disease (CD), for instance, has recently been shown to convey advantages over conventional therapy in a 2020 randomized control trial (RCT) ( 1 ). While evidence-based guidelines have been developed outlining the concomitant use of anti-TNF agents and immunomodulators [including thiopurines and methotrexate (MTX)] in both adult and pediatric populations, there exists a paucity of data guiding evidence-based strategies for their subsequent withdrawal in pediatric patients who enter sustained remission ( 2 5 ) ( Table 1 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition to low treatment adherence, a range of adverse effects such as growth retardation, reduced bone mass index, increased risk of infections and malignancy are associated with current medical treatments given in IBD [18][19][20][21][22]. Moreover, sustained remission rates of all currently available drugs do not surpass 40% and even in responders breakthrough flares are not uncommon [19,[23][24][25][26]. Adding to this, persistent inflammation can progress to complications such as strictures, abscesses, and fistulae, which often require surgery in CD, whereas development of acute severe colitis in UC can necessitate a colectomy [27].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%