2019
DOI: 10.1111/bjh.16264
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

First‐line R‐CVP versus R‐CHOP induction immunochemotherapy for indolent lymphoma with rituximab maintenance. A multicentre, phase III randomized study by the Polish Lymphoma Research Group PLRG4

Abstract: Summary R‐CVP (cyclophosphamide, vincristine, prednisone) and R‐CHOP (cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, prednisone + rituximab) are immunochemotherapy regimens frequently used for remission induction of indolent non‐Hodgkin lymphomas (iNHLs). Rituximab maintenance (RM) significantly improves progression‐free survival (PFS) in patients with complete/partial remission (CR/PR). Here we report the final results of a randomized study comparing R‐CVP to R‐CHOP both followed by RM. Untreated patients in nee… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
14
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

4
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
2
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…9 The ORR by 2007 IWG criteria in the present study (CT-P10, 93%; rituximab, 94%) was also similar to the ORR of 97% (assessed by CT scans per IWG criteria) reported in a study evaluating rituximab and CVP (R-CVP) induction treatment followed by maintenance rituximab in patients with previously untreated indolent non-Hodgkin lymphoma. 12 Assessment methods and treatment regimens vary between studies, but findings for time-to-event analyses in our study were generally comparable with previous reports in patients with advanced-stage FL who had been treated with induction R-CVP followed by maintenance rituximab. The estimated 3-year PFS rates were 77% in 2 previous studies, 13,14 compared with 67% (CT-P10) and 69% (rituximab) in ours.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…9 The ORR by 2007 IWG criteria in the present study (CT-P10, 93%; rituximab, 94%) was also similar to the ORR of 97% (assessed by CT scans per IWG criteria) reported in a study evaluating rituximab and CVP (R-CVP) induction treatment followed by maintenance rituximab in patients with previously untreated indolent non-Hodgkin lymphoma. 12 Assessment methods and treatment regimens vary between studies, but findings for time-to-event analyses in our study were generally comparable with previous reports in patients with advanced-stage FL who had been treated with induction R-CVP followed by maintenance rituximab. The estimated 3-year PFS rates were 77% in 2 previous studies, 13,14 compared with 67% (CT-P10) and 69% (rituximab) in ours.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Our study was conducted in the rituximab era. In 1997 this monoclonal anti-CD20 antibody gained the Food and Drug Administration approval in FL treatment, and in early 2000 the European Union and Poland have started its implementation 32,33 . The standardized death rate in Poland in 2014 is similar to the SEER data 34 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The HT rate of FL is difficult to estimate [ 11 ] and it is assumed about 2–3% per year from diagnosis [ 12 , 13 , 14 ]. Recently, significantly prolonged progression-free survival was observed when treated with modern therapies [ 15 , 16 ], however its remains incurable for the majority of elderly individuals [ 6 , 17 , 18 ]. Therefore, extensive “omics” studies dealing with the molecular aspect of FL are highly recommended.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%