2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.esmoop.2020.100003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

First-line immune checkpoint inhibitors for extensive stage small-cell lung cancer: clinical developments and future directions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
28
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
0
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Over the past 30 years, platinum-containing chemotherapy has been the standard treatment 14 . We conducted this meta-analysis with the continuous development of immunotherapy drugs and the publication and the update of more and more relative clinical trial results 15,16 . Compared with previous studies 17,18 , we have updated the data from the latest clinical trials, and our conclusions on safety are different from those of previous studies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Over the past 30 years, platinum-containing chemotherapy has been the standard treatment 14 . We conducted this meta-analysis with the continuous development of immunotherapy drugs and the publication and the update of more and more relative clinical trial results 15,16 . Compared with previous studies 17,18 , we have updated the data from the latest clinical trials, and our conclusions on safety are different from those of previous studies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, IMpower 133 included 10% of patients receiving PCI in both arms, whereas in CASPIAN, only the control arm was permitted to receive optional PCI, with no difference noted in the incidence of brain metastases. However, patients with asymptomatic treated brain metastases performed poorly in all arms of both studies, yet the number of patients with asymptomatic treated brain metastases was small, and no patient with untreated brain metastases was allowed, rendering the question of management of patients with brain metastases an unmet need, and a significant limitation of the two studies [66]. Three other clinical controversies not tackled in IMpower 133, and CASPIAN include the absence of consolidative thoracic radiotherapy, the exclusion of patients with disease-related borderline and/or poor performance status, as well as patients with disease-related paraneoplastic auto-immune disorders.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The phase III CASPIAN study revealed that the combination of durvalumab significantly improved overall response rate (ORR) and prolonged OS in extensive-stage SCLC, whereas PFS could not benefit from it (5.1 versus 5.4 months) (25). Updated findings presented at the 2020 ESMO annual meeting (26) showed that patients with SCLC treated with durvalumab had a similar proportion (8.3% versus 9.5%) developed brain metastases compared to those without it.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%