2009
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd001841.pub2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

First-line drugs for hypertension

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
98
0
6

Year Published

2010
2010
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 154 publications
(112 citation statements)
references
References 133 publications
8
98
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…10 The estimated NNS in MARC of 183 (CACS alone) or 159 (CACS combined with CCTA) in order to prevent one cardiovascular event in the next 5 years with statin treatment is low compared to other accepted screening tests, such as mammography to prevent a death from breast cancer in women aged 50-59 years (NNS 2451) or a cardiovascular event in mild-to-moderate hypertension (140-160 mmHg; NNS 279). 30,31 The NNS would have been even lower if we had used the lower 21 instead of the higher 28 NNT estimate derived from the MESA study. 21 Investigating asymptomatic persons with CCT invariably raises issues.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…10 The estimated NNS in MARC of 183 (CACS alone) or 159 (CACS combined with CCTA) in order to prevent one cardiovascular event in the next 5 years with statin treatment is low compared to other accepted screening tests, such as mammography to prevent a death from breast cancer in women aged 50-59 years (NNS 2451) or a cardiovascular event in mild-to-moderate hypertension (140-160 mmHg; NNS 279). 30,31 The NNS would have been even lower if we had used the lower 21 instead of the higher 28 NNT estimate derived from the MESA study. 21 Investigating asymptomatic persons with CCT invariably raises issues.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…230,234237 In one of these meta-analyses evaluating different classes of agents used as first-line therapy in subjects with a baseline BP >140/90 mm Hg, thiazide diuretics (RR, 0.63; 95% CI, 0.57–0.71), β-blockers (RR, 0.83; 95% CI, 0.72–0.97), ACEIs (RR, 0.65; 95% CI, 0.52–0.82), and calcium channel blockers (RR, 0.58; 95% CI, 0.41–0.84) each reduced the risk of stroke compared with placebo or no treatment. 236 Compared with thiazides, β-blockers, ACEIs, and ARBs, calcium channel blockers appear to have a slightly greater effect on reducing the risk of stroke, although the effect is not seen for other cardiovascular outcomes and was of small magnitude (8% relative reduction in risk). 235 One meta-analysis found that diuretic therapy was superior to ACEI therapy, 230 and another found that calcium channel blockers were superior to ACEIs.…”
Section: Well-documented and Modifiable Risk Factorsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…There is an obvious interest in further investigating whether BP lowering by any of the major classes of antihypertensive therapy can be shown to be effective in reducing all or part of cardiovascular outcomes. Several meta-analyses have approached this problem in the past, [16][17][18][19][20][98][99][100][101][102][103][104][105][106] but none of them has been comprehensive of all BP-lowering RCTs from 1966 to the end of 2013 and simultaneously exclusive of RCTs comparing different active regimens (the latter type of trials aim at avoiding, instead of inducing, a between-group BP difference) and of RCTs investigating antihypertensive drugs in the treatment of conditions different from hypertension (such as myocardial infarction and HF). Figure 3A).…”
Section: Effects Of Bp Lowering Produced By Drugs Belonging To Differmentioning
confidence: 99%