1997
DOI: 10.1111/j.1439-0388.1997.tb00493.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

First identification of reciprocal translocations in Polish pigs

Abstract: Two different reciprocal translocations, rcp (8;14) (p21;q25) and rcp (7;13) (q13;q46), were described for the first time in Poland in the Polish Landrace and Duroc pigs. Observation of synaptonemal complexes showed the presence of a quadrivalent composed of translocational chromosomes and their homologues. Individuals carrying translocations were characterized by normal external appearance and correct semen parameters. Analysis of fertility made on the basis of litter size demonstrated that fertility decrease… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Almost 60% of them were reported to be involved in reciprocal translocations, common karyotype rearrangement, formed in majority de novo and associated with considerably reduced fertility in this species (about 50% decreased litter size on an average) (Gustavsson, 1990;Danielak-Czech et al, 1996). Several autosomal unstable regions were unmasked on chromosome 13 (seven fragile sites) and identified as the breakpoints in eight translocations identified in population studies (Long, 1991;Danielak-Czech et al, 1997;Pinton et al, 2000). By contrast, the X-specific fragile sites have been observed rarely and one of them only (Xp2.1) was correlated to the translocation breakpoint.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Almost 60% of them were reported to be involved in reciprocal translocations, common karyotype rearrangement, formed in majority de novo and associated with considerably reduced fertility in this species (about 50% decreased litter size on an average) (Gustavsson, 1990;Danielak-Czech et al, 1996). Several autosomal unstable regions were unmasked on chromosome 13 (seven fragile sites) and identified as the breakpoints in eight translocations identified in population studies (Long, 1991;Danielak-Czech et al, 1997;Pinton et al, 2000). By contrast, the X-specific fragile sites have been observed rarely and one of them only (Xp2.1) was correlated to the translocation breakpoint.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since that time, 11 new reciprocal translocations have been published: rcp(8;14)(p21;q25) and rcp(7;13)(q13;q46) [7], rcp(2;9;14)(q23;q22;q25) and rcp(7;15)(q24;q26) [20], rcp(13;17)(q41;q11) and rcp(2;14)(q13;q27) [9], rcp(8;10)(p11;q13) [22], rcp(1;7)(q17;q26), rcp(4;12)(p13;q13) and rcp(1;6)(q17;q35) [25], and a 1q+/15q− translocation [18]. Including the eight new cases reported here, the total number of reciprocal translocations known in the pig species is presently 87.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The overall rate of chromosomal rearrangements in hypoprolific boars in service is close to 50 % and its prevalence in young untested AI boar candidates is 0.47 % [ 6 ]. This most probably reflects the rate of “de novo” abnormalities, since in other less intensively tested populations the frequency of abnormalities is usually much higher according to reports from Poland (1 %), the Netherlands (1.5 %) and Spain (3.4 %) [ 5 , 7 , 8 ]. Prior to this study, a systematical screening for chromosome abnormalities was not implemented in Canada but a few cases have been identified in Canadian pig populations, including a rcp(Xp+;14q−) [ 9 , 10 ], rcp(1;6)(p22,q12), rcp(10;13), and rcp(9;14)(p24;q27) [ 11 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%