2018
DOI: 10.1029/2018gl079061
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

First Identification of Mafic Igneous Enclaves in Miocene Lavas of Southern Tibet With Implications for Indian Continental Subduction

Abstract: The history of Indian continental subduction beneath Asian plate remains unclear. Miocene ultrapotassic rocks in southern Tibet, with extremely enriched isotopes, have often been used to trace mantle metasomatism and geodynamic processes associated with Indian continental subduction. These rocks, however, may have been contaminated by Lhasa ancient crust. Uncertainties on primary ultrapotassic magmas obscure their mantle sources. Here we report on first mafic igneous enclaves in Cenozoic lavas of southern Tibe… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Miocene lavas of the Lasha Block (Hao et al, 2018). A thick layer of amphibolite in the middle-lower crust of southern Tibet is also consistent with the observed high heat flows (~90 mW m −2 ) in the Himalaya Orogen and the Lasha Block because the radiogenic heat production in amphibolite is much higher than those in mafic granulite or eclogite (Jiang et al, 2019).…”
Section: Journal Of Geophysical Research: Solid Earthsupporting
confidence: 78%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Miocene lavas of the Lasha Block (Hao et al, 2018). A thick layer of amphibolite in the middle-lower crust of southern Tibet is also consistent with the observed high heat flows (~90 mW m −2 ) in the Himalaya Orogen and the Lasha Block because the radiogenic heat production in amphibolite is much higher than those in mafic granulite or eclogite (Jiang et al, 2019).…”
Section: Journal Of Geophysical Research: Solid Earthsupporting
confidence: 78%
“…Based on these similarities, we propose a relatively thick layer of subducting amphibolitic Indian crust in middle‐lower crust beneath southern Tibet. Such an interpretation is also supported by geochemical evidence showing the contribution of Indian continental subduction to the formation of mafic igneous enclaves in Miocene lavas of the Lasha Block (Hao et al, 2018). A thick layer of amphibolite in the middle‐lower crust of southern Tibet is also consistent with the observed high heat flows (~90 mW m −2 ) in the Himalaya Orogen and the Lasha Block because the radiogenic heat production in amphibolite is much higher than those in mafic granulite or eclogite (Jiang et al, 2019).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 68%
“…The stranded, weak, and permeable Indian crust (Klemperer et al., 2013; the pale yellow and orange block), cut by the lithosphere‐scale KF, is shown just below the Asian/Tibetan upper crust. Rapid uplift of the SE Karakoram range induced by delamination of the lithosphere above the mantle wedge ultrapotassic volcanism at places (Cheng & Guo, 2017; Hao et al., 2018) (shown by orange triangles). Blue curves indicate the evident flow of mantle sourced He to the surface in the SE Karakoram range (Klemperer et al., 2013) and southwestern Tibet (Hoke et al., 2000).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Subsurface structures are based on: (a) Rolland et al., 2009. (b) Longitudinal variation in compiled ultra potassic and adakitic magmatism ages from the Tibet (Data from: Arnaud et al., 1992; Chen et al., 2011, 2012; Cheng & Guo, 2017; Ding et al., 2003; Guo et al., 2013; Hao et al., 2018; Kapp et al., 2003; D. Liu et al., 2014; Z. C. Liu et al., 2014; Liu et al., 2017; Miller et al., 1999; Williams et al., 2001, 2004; Zhang et al., 2017). (c) Longitudinal variation in compiled thermochronological data from the Tibet and Karakoram range (Data from Carrapa et al., 2014; Copeland et al., 1995; Dai et al., 2013; Gourbet et al., 2016; Sanchez et al., 2013; Shen et al., 2016 and this study).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation