2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.mambio.2009.01.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

First genetic analysis of a free-living population of the threatened goitered gazelle (Gazella subgutturosa)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Several antelope taxa, among them eland ( Taurotragus oryx Pallas, 1766), vulnerable and endangered Gazella and Procapra species and the critically endangered saiga antelope ( Saiga tatarica Linnaeus, 1766), yielded similarly high or even higher values of mtDNA diversity (Lorenzen et al. 2010; Zachos et al. 2010a and references therein).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several antelope taxa, among them eland ( Taurotragus oryx Pallas, 1766), vulnerable and endangered Gazella and Procapra species and the critically endangered saiga antelope ( Saiga tatarica Linnaeus, 1766), yielded similarly high or even higher values of mtDNA diversity (Lorenzen et al. 2010; Zachos et al. 2010a and references therein).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, when compared with genetic variation of other wild gazelles using the least biased estimator (H E ), such as Grant's gazelle (0.61, Arctander et al 1996), Chiru (0.84, Zhou et al 2007) and goitered gazelle (0.72, Zachos et al 2010), the nuclear genetic diversity of Przewalski's gazelle is relatively low. Previous genetic study on Przewalski's gazelle using mtDNA also found that the nucleotide diversity (\0.004) of Przewalski's gazelle is lower than most mammals (Lei et al 2003a).…”
Section: Genetic Diversitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both marker systems are highly variable at the intraspecific level and have often been used in population and conservation genetic studies before (e.g. Pertoldi et al 2001;McDevitt et al 2009;Zachos et al 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%