2018
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0191920
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

First field evaluation of the optimized CE marked Abbott protocol for HIV RNA testing on dried blood spot in a routine clinical setting in Vietnam

Abstract: BackgroundViral load (VL) monitoring of HIV-infected patients in decentralized areas is limited due to logistic constraints. Dried Blood Spots (DBS) offer the opportunity to collect samples in remote area which can be easily transferred and tested at a central laboratory. The MOVIDA (Monitoring Of Viral load In Decentralized Area) project evaluated the performance of VL measurements on DBS using the new CE marked optimized Abbott protocol.MethodsHIV-1 infected adults from three outpatient clinics in Hanoi (Vie… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
18
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
(35 reference statements)
4
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The higher level in plasma may also be due to the lack of hematocrit adjustment as reported in other studies [19,20]. This slightly lower average HIV RNA levels in DBS than in plasma has also been observed in other studies with average differences ranging between 0.07-0.76 log 10 copies/mL [5,12,16,21,22]. The smaller volume of blood tested in DBS might also explain that 2 DBS were undetectable while the corresponding plasma specimens had low HIV RNA VL (2.18 and 2.19 log 10 cp/mL) which were below the threshold of detection in DBS.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 73%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The higher level in plasma may also be due to the lack of hematocrit adjustment as reported in other studies [19,20]. This slightly lower average HIV RNA levels in DBS than in plasma has also been observed in other studies with average differences ranging between 0.07-0.76 log 10 copies/mL [5,12,16,21,22]. The smaller volume of blood tested in DBS might also explain that 2 DBS were undetectable while the corresponding plasma specimens had low HIV RNA VL (2.18 and 2.19 log 10 cp/mL) which were below the threshold of detection in DBS.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 73%
“…Routine monitoring of HIV RNA VL using DBS has been successfully implemented in resource-limited settings such as Angola, Tanzania, and Cameroon [10][11][12]. Several studies have evaluated the performances of the Abbott m2000 platform for the measurement of RNA in DBS versus plasma [5,[13][14][15][16]. Those studies were conducted among different populations (naïve or on ART) and used different DBS processing protocols.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We reported a slightly lower rate of virological success than previous studies [23,24,31], and one could object that DBS use could explain this due to the proviral DNA amplification [37]. However, the technique used for viral load measurement on DBS, which is CE-marked, performed well in an evaluation in the same laboratory [14]. Of note, another evaluation in PWID in Vietnam reported a very similar virological failure rate [29].…”
Section: Plos Onementioning
confidence: 41%
“…Hence, the MOVIDA 2 project (Monitoring Of Viral load In Decentralised Area, Clinical trials ID: NCT03249493) was implemented to evaluate, in real-life conditions, the feasibility of DBS use for HIV viral load monitoring in remote provinces in North Vietnam, where no routine HIV viral load monitoring was available. Prior to this project, two laboratory evaluations were conducted establishing that, at the central laboratory in charge of viral load measurement, viral load results on DBS and plasma compared well and fulfilled WHO requirements [13,14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The same scarcity situation must be noted for viral serology techniques, for which there is neither regulatory approval for use on DBS nor official application note from manufacturers. Despite these important limitations, DBS collection is recommended by WHO for diagnosis of HIV and viral hepatitis B and C in field settings to improve access to screening and management of populations with poor access to serum tests (Soulier et al, 2016;Taieb et al, 2018).…”
Section: Serological and Molecular Testing Using Dbs In The Fieldmentioning
confidence: 99%